Whose discourse tells you: the column is there or that, is there; whether it is obvious or hidden behind the multiplicity of apparitions, the column is. But the column has no Being, nor any being-there, whether here or elsewhere. It belongs to no one. You have no hold over it, you will never absolutely control its extension. You will not take it from somewhere else and put it here. You will not cite it to appear. And from this column's not being(a being), from its not falling under the power of the is, all of Western metaphysics, which lives in the certainty of that is, has revolved around the column. 對不起 我實在看不懂這段文字真正的意思 只知道他大概是在說，真實被語言所遮蔽，語言又受到文化規範的影響。 可以請求各位為我解釋一下嗎 對不起 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.26.166