Whose discourse tells you: the column is there or that, is there; whether it is obvious or hidden behind the multiplicity of apparitions, the column is. But the column has no Being, nor any being-there, whether here or elsewhere. It belongs to no one. You have no hold over it, you will never absolutely control its extension. You will not take it from somewhere else and put it here. You will not cite it to appear. And from this column's not being(a being), from its not falling under the power of the is, all of Western metaphysics, which lives in the certainty of that is, has revolved around the column. 对不起 我实在看不懂这段文字真正的意思 只知道他大概是在说，真实被语言所遮蔽，语言又受到文化规范的影响。 可以请求各位为我解释一下吗 对不起 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.26.166