請問一下 版上有投過PRL的過來人 我投稿PRL後 初審沒過 收到拒搞信如下: We have considered your manuscript and conclude that it is not suited for Physical Review Letters. We make no judgment on the correctness or technical aspects of your work. However, from our understanding of the paper's physics results, context, and motivation, we conclude that your paper does not meet the Physical Review Letters criteria of impact, innovation, and interest. Our criteria require a clear justification for consideration of the paper by PRL, rather than by a specialized journal. Your work appears better suited for submittal to the latter. [Please see our editorial We might consider a revised version of your paper, but only if it makes a transparent and compelling case for publication in PRL, as opposed to a more specialized journal. If a version arrives that makes this case well, we may decide that anonymous review is warranted. If we continue to find the manuscript unsuitable for review, possibly following input from a Divisional Associate Editor, we will inform you promptly. 請問一下 有沒有過來人 收到過這種拒搞信? 這種拒搞信是否意味著 還是可以直接轉投PRB? 有沒有人收到這種拒搞信後 轉頭其他PR系列 有成功過的例子? 還請各位不吝分享過來的經驗 ╭──────────── 提醒：版規三及版規四 ─────────────╮ │解題文需附上自己的解題過程或自己對題目的理解 │ │問題文需先自行查過網路資料並附上對資料的初步理解 │ │問題獲得回答後也勿任意刪除文章，並適度的向回答者表達感謝之意 │ ╰──────────────────────────閱讀後可用ctrl+y刪除╯ 【出處】(習題或問題的出處) 【題目】(題目的文字敘述，如有圖片亦可提供圖片) 【瓶頸】(解題瓶頸或思考脈絡，請盡量詳述以利回答者知道要從何處講解指導) (錯誤示範：第X題我不會，求詳解) (錯誤示範：acceleration of gravity是什麼意思我看不懂) (正確示範：我算出來的答案好像不太對，這是我的計算過程，哪裡出問題?) --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 119.14.87.115 ※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/Physics/M.1506064504.A.249.html