作者alfadick (悟道修行者)
看板Eng-Class
標題[文法] 幾句 分 詞 構 句 (追加問題 !!)
時間Fri Mar 30 20:48:06 2012
"I withdrew five hundred dollars from the bank, stuffed it into a white enve
lope. "
橫看豎看, stuffed都不像按照分詞構句文法所產生出來的產物(比較可能是stuffing)
請問何解？
"Doors were split and smashed off their hinges; walls were dented in the
shape of fists, phones, and flowerpots; Herbal was hiding in a hotel room
scared for his life; and Mystery was collapsed on the living room carpet cry
ing."
那個crying是分詞構句產生出來的嗎? 那為什麼前面不需加逗號"," ?
另外: I couldn't waste time arguing. 後面加arguing 是哪招文法?
是動詞 waste 特有的用法? yahoo奇摩字典去查waste,
好像也沒看到什麼特別的說明啊, 感覺跟正常的單字一樣 @@
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.25.1.21
※ 編輯: alfadick 來自: 114.25.1.21 (03/30 20:54)
1F：推 linzh:關於第一句 你可能要注意是否後面還有出現連接詞(ex. and) 03/30 21:37
謝謝幫忙, 全文如下：
I withdrew five hundred dollars from the bank, stuffed it into a white
envelope, and wrote Mystery on the front. It was not the proudest
moment of my life.
※ 編輯: alfadick 來自: 114.25.1.21 (03/30 21:50)
2F：→ alfadick:取自外國小說 03/30 21:50
3F：推 balloon:第一題，不是分詞構句，是我做了A, B, and C 03/30 22:40
4F：→ alfadick:噢噢，感謝！所以我可以寫I walk to school, see the 03/30 23:15
5F：→ alfadick:bird fly. 嗎？ (打太快，用過去簡單式walked跟saw XD) 03/30 23:15
6F：→ balloon:只有兩件事,中間要加and. 03/31 03:00
感謝, 另外請問,
I saw the man cry. 改被動 => The man was seen to cry by me.
I saw the man crying. 改被動 => The man was seen crying by me.
那麼, 本身就有被動的"I saw the bike fixed by him."
如果我要以The bike為主詞寫另一種的被動句, 請問要怎麼寫呢?
翻遍手上文法書, 剛好這模糊地帶沒人講 @@
※ 編輯: alfadick 來自: 114.25.1.21 (03/31 09:00)
7F：推 SetsunaLeo:為了考試念英文好痛苦......沒什麼人會這樣造句啦..... 03/31 11:29
8F：→ SetsunaLeo:這種模糊地帶沒人講就是因為沒人這樣造 03/31 11:30
9F：→ alfadick:嗯嗯, 因為自然而然就想把文法念得有系統一點 03/31 12:59
另外請問, However he tries, he never seems able to work satisfactorily.
這個however作副詞解, 還是作連接詞解？
※ 編輯: alfadick 來自: 114.25.1.21 (03/31 17:01)
10F：推 linzh:連接詞 03/31 17:25
http://tw.dictionary.yahoo.com/dictionary?p=however
但它說是副詞，Dr. eyes寫錯了？
※ 編輯: alfadick 來自: 114.25.1.21 (03/31 17:47)
11F：→ alfadick::p 03/31 17:48
12F：→ alfadick:所以 I think,therefore I am.跟I think therefore I am 03/31 17:56
13F：→ alfadick:全是錯誤的文法囉？ 03/31 17:56
http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/however_1
這是however作adverb時的說明(作conj在別的網頁)
2 used to say that it does not matter how big, good, serious etc something is
because it will not change a situation in any way [= no matter how]:
出現這個例句：We have to finish, however long it takes.
這裡的however非得是conj不可吧？
除非他寫 We have to finish; however long it takes. 才是adverb?
等等...我懷疑 however long it takes 這句話不是從屬子句 QQ
這是哪招啊= =???
※ 編輯: alfadick 來自: 114.25.1.21 (03/31 18:03)
14F：→ dunchee:(英文)實際用法先出現，之後學者才加以整理歸類，換句話說 04/01 08:45
15F：→ dunchee:"所謂的(英文)實際用法先出現，之後學者才加以整理歸類， 04/01 08:46
16F：→ dunchee:"所謂的文法"永遠只能在後頭跟，尚未歸類到的/尚未被廣為 04/01 08:46
17F：→ dunchee:接受的/尚未...的/你自然讀不到/有疑惑 參考: 04/01 08:47
18F：→ dunchee:dunchee.blogspot.com/2007/06/please-come-in.html 04/01 08:47
20F：→ alfadick:受教了！！！ 04/01 14:48