作者alfadick (悟道修行者)
看板Eng-Class
标题[文法] 几句 分 词 构 句 (追加问题 !!)
时间Fri Mar 30 20:48:06 2012
"I withdrew five hundred dollars from the bank, stuffed it into a white enve
lope. "
横看竖看, stuffed都不像按照分词构句文法所产生出来的产物(比较可能是stuffing)
请问何解？
"Doors were split and smashed off their hinges; walls were dented in the
shape of fists, phones, and flowerpots; Herbal was hiding in a hotel room
scared for his life; and Mystery was collapsed on the living room carpet cry
ing."
那个crying是分词构句产生出来的吗? 那为什麽前面不需加逗号"," ?
另外: I couldn't waste time arguing. 後面加arguing 是哪招文法?
是动词 waste 特有的用法? yahoo奇摩字典去查waste,
好像也没看到什麽特别的说明啊, 感觉跟正常的单字一样 @@
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.25.1.21
※ 编辑: alfadick 来自: 114.25.1.21 (03/30 20:54)
1F：推 linzh:关於第一句 你可能要注意是否後面还有出现连接词(ex. and) 03/30 21:37
谢谢帮忙, 全文如下：
I withdrew five hundred dollars from the bank, stuffed it into a white
envelope, and wrote Mystery on the front. It was not the proudest
moment of my life.
※ 编辑: alfadick 来自: 114.25.1.21 (03/30 21:50)
2F：→ alfadick:取自外国小说 03/30 21:50
3F：推 balloon:第一题，不是分词构句，是我做了A, B, and C 03/30 22:40
4F：→ alfadick:噢噢，感谢！所以我可以写I walk to school, see the 03/30 23:15
5F：→ alfadick:bird fly. 吗？ (打太快，用过去简单式walked跟saw XD) 03/30 23:15
6F：→ balloon:只有两件事,中间要加and. 03/31 03:00
感谢, 另外请问,
I saw the man cry. 改被动 => The man was seen to cry by me.
I saw the man crying. 改被动 => The man was seen crying by me.
那麽, 本身就有被动的"I saw the bike fixed by him."
如果我要以The bike为主词写另一种的被动句, 请问要怎麽写呢?
翻遍手上文法书, 刚好这模糊地带没人讲 @@
※ 编辑: alfadick 来自: 114.25.1.21 (03/31 09:00)
7F：推 SetsunaLeo:为了考试念英文好痛苦......没什麽人会这样造句啦..... 03/31 11:29
8F：→ SetsunaLeo:这种模糊地带没人讲就是因为没人这样造 03/31 11:30
9F：→ alfadick:嗯嗯, 因为自然而然就想把文法念得有系统一点 03/31 12:59
另外请问, However he tries, he never seems able to work satisfactorily.
这个however作副词解, 还是作连接词解？
※ 编辑: alfadick 来自: 114.25.1.21 (03/31 17:01)
10F：推 linzh:连接词 03/31 17:25
http://tw.dictionary.yahoo.com/dictionary?p=however
但它说是副词，Dr. eyes写错了？
※ 编辑: alfadick 来自: 114.25.1.21 (03/31 17:47)
11F：→ alfadick::p 03/31 17:48
12F：→ alfadick:所以 I think,therefore I am.跟I think therefore I am 03/31 17:56
13F：→ alfadick:全是错误的文法罗？ 03/31 17:56
http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/however_1
这是however作adverb时的说明(作conj在别的网页)
2 used to say that it does not matter how big, good, serious etc something is
because it will not change a situation in any way [= no matter how]:
出现这个例句：We have to finish, however long it takes.
这里的however非得是conj不可吧？
除非他写 We have to finish; however long it takes. 才是adverb?
等等...我怀疑 however long it takes 这句话不是从属子句 QQ
这是哪招啊= =???
※ 编辑: alfadick 来自: 114.25.1.21 (03/31 18:03)
14F：→ dunchee:(英文)实际用法先出现，之後学者才加以整理归类，换句话说 04/01 08:45
15F：→ dunchee:"所谓的(英文)实际用法先出现，之後学者才加以整理归类， 04/01 08:46
16F：→ dunchee:"所谓的文法"永远只能在後头跟，尚未归类到的/尚未被广为 04/01 08:46
17F：→ dunchee:接受的/尚未...的/你自然读不到/有疑惑 参考: 04/01 08:47
18F：→ dunchee:dunchee.blogspot.com/2007/06/please-come-in.html 04/01 08:47
20F：→ alfadick:受教了！！！ 04/01 14:48