作者balenoer (火球金魚)
看板Eng-Class
標題Re: [文法] CNN雜誌這段是否有錯?
時間Wed Jul 13 13:20:55 2011
不，小弟覺得是這樣裡怪怪的~
The public generally assumes that if one is selling
S V ↑這個that後面整個是名詞子句當受詞用，沒錯。
再來的if是條件子句也沒錯，
something on the market,
that we have had assurances that that device is safe.
↑但這怎又會多一個that? 應該是沒有that才對阿。
因為 we have had assurances...這句就是名詞子句裡頭的主詞+動詞+受詞了
所以我認為正確是
The public generally assumes that if one is selling something on
the market, we have had assurances that that device is safe.
不知道大家的意見是?
※ 引述《balenoer (火球金魚)》之銘言：
: 小弟今天在看CNN英文雜誌，發現其中有一段話似乎怪怪的?
: 是不是文法有問題阿，好像有多一個that?板上高手能幫忙
: 解答嗎?謝謝~
: The public generally assumes that if one is selling something
: on the market, that we have had assurances that that device
: is safe.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.20.187.2
1F：→ mrhalliwell:沒有that 看起來像是if的主要子句 應該也合理 07/13 14:18
2F：→ mrhalliwell:有that 假設是指something的話 也能解釋的了 07/13 14:19
3F：→ mrhalliwell:不過反正是口語的 應該不要太仔細去想文法 07/13 14:20
4F：推 KatherineM:對齁..有if~ 感覺你說的是正確的 07/13 15:11
5F：→ balenoer:後來聽網友的開導後，我想dunchee兄說的是對的 07/13 18:56
6F：→ balenoer:這種手稿就別太在意文法了 @@ 07/13 18:56