作者balenoer (火球金鱼)
看板Eng-Class
标题Re: [文法] CNN杂志这段是否有错?
时间Wed Jul 13 13:20:55 2011
不，小弟觉得是这样里怪怪的~
The public generally assumes that if one is selling
S V ↑这个that後面整个是名词子句当受词用，没错。
再来的if是条件子句也没错，
something on the market,
that we have had assurances that that device is safe.
↑但这怎又会多一个that? 应该是没有that才对阿。
因为 we have had assurances...这句就是名词子句里头的主词+动词+受词了
所以我认为正确是
The public generally assumes that if one is selling something on
the market, we have had assurances that that device is safe.
不知道大家的意见是?
※ 引述《balenoer (火球金鱼)》之铭言：
: 小弟今天在看CNN英文杂志，发现其中有一段话似乎怪怪的?
: 是不是文法有问题阿，好像有多一个that?板上高手能帮忙
: 解答吗?谢谢~
: The public generally assumes that if one is selling something
: on the market, that we have had assurances that that device
: is safe.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.20.187.2
1F：→ mrhalliwell:没有that 看起来像是if的主要子句 应该也合理 07/13 14:18
2F：→ mrhalliwell:有that 假设是指something的话 也能解释的了 07/13 14:19
3F：→ mrhalliwell:不过反正是口语的 应该不要太仔细去想文法 07/13 14:20
4F：推 KatherineM:对齁..有if~ 感觉你说的是正确的 07/13 15:11
5F：→ balenoer:後来听网友的开导後，我想dunchee兄说的是对的 07/13 18:56
6F：→ balenoer:这种手稿就别太在意文法了 @@ 07/13 18:56