作者easterday (....)
看板Eng-Class
標題[請益] 請教一個smite的例句
時間Sun Jun 5 20:21:50 2011
想請問一個Smite的例句
He was so smitten with the view that he stopped and took out his camera.
^^^^
中文翻譯是:他被這景象所震撼,所以停下來拿出照相機。
我發現這種限定用法,如果用連接詞 and的對等子句的逗號可以不寫的話,
我常常不能理解這種句子的斷句
1. 想先請教的點是, that 後面的限定用法應該是
(a) the view that he stopped
還是
(b) the view that he stopped and took out his camera
(a)的翻譯有點怪
但是如果不能接受(a)的翻譯那(b)我也翻譯不出來了
2. 我對於這個with 是不是應該改成by 有一點意見
如果是確定是用with沒錯的話
本句就可以改寫成
Something smited him with the view that he stopped and took out his camera.
(這句實在沒有存在的可能性,某個東西打他,用這個景色..這也太怪了一點吧)
如果正確的用法是用by
本句就可以改寫成
The view that he stopped and took out his camera smited him.
(這句的存在性好像高一點,某個景色拍打他,這可能是種比喻式的用法)
3. 經過我思考超過30分鐘以上的結果,我忽然想到這可能是分詞構句的隱身版本
本來的句子應該改成
With the view, he was so smitten that he stopped and took out his camera.
(這句我覺得存在性是最高的...)
那只有with可以當成分詞構句,by就不能當分詞構句了嗎?
我的意思是
By the view, he was so smitten that he stopped and took out his camera.
(這句的存在性會如何呢?)
因為我不是相關科系,請求指教...
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.40.124.119
1F：推 bheegrl:他對於令他止步並拿相機鎖定的景色感到震撼。(還算順吧?) 06/05 21:16
2F：→ bheegrl:不過應該是(a)對吧，因為有"震撼"的因，才有拿相機的"果" 06/05 21:26
4F：→ dunchee:1. 原句用的是 so ... that ... 的句型(並不是用that...這 06/05 22:48
5F：→ dunchee:子句的內容(限定用法)來特別限定/指定一特定view 06/05 22:49
7F：→ dunchee:-> 1 ... 找 — often + that *She was so..... 06/05 22:51
8F：→ dunchee:2. 參考字典內容用法介紹 06/05 22:51
9F：→ dunchee:(整個內容都要看) 06/05 22:53
10F：→ dunchee:3. 不需要過份複雜化 06/05 22:53
11F：推 KatherineM:推樓上~這裡是 so... that "太(震撼)以至於(拿出相機來 06/06 00:23
12F：→ KatherineM:拍攝) 而不是針對 view 的限定用法喲~ 06/06 00:24
13F：推 NaaL:2. 不是所有看起來像是被動語態的都是搭配by 06/06 19:40