補上原文的前幾句: There's a lot that's been written lately about how the Web is puréeing people's gray matter. The most thorough take on the topic is Nicholas Carr’s new book, The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, but anyone who's been spending a lot of time surfing is probably going to be so distracted by e-mails and Facebook, etc., that he won't be able to finish the book. ※ 引述《alicezzz》之銘言： : Instead, he'll turn, with irony, to the Web, where he'll find plenty to read, : especially if he's looking for (1)it today: The New York Times has just ^^^ ↑ 所以我的問題(1)it 也可能是指Nicholas Carr's new book嗎? 但是這樣↑處，不就應該要是句號才對嗎? 為什麼是冒號 ><? : published two stories, a blog post, and an interactive feature (2-1)arguing : that the electronic methods (2-2)by which they themselves are : (2-3)delivered are “intrusive, have increased [people's] levels of stress and have made it : difficult to concentrate.” : 疑問如下： : (1) : 這裡的it 是指 The New York Times...concentrate. 這篇文章嗎 : (2) : -1 arguing是 which is arguing 的簡化嗎? 可是非人怎麼會argue(解釋為主張?) : -2 by which這句的還原如下，是嗎? : They themselves are delivered.....concentrated” by the electronic methods. : -3 deliver 在這裡怎麼解釋阿? : (3) : 我對這段的理解如下，是對的嗎? (因為其實看不太懂) : 諷刺的是，他會開始上網，並且在網路上發現一大堆可讀的， : 特別是他今天所尋找的文章: 紐約時報已有兩種網路出版品， : 一種是部落格，一種是互動媒材。 : 這種互動媒材自己也被視為「入侵的，會增加人的壓力且造成不專心」 : == : 原文出處: http://0rz.tw/hMe9b : 感謝大家 Orz --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.134.38.124