补上原文的前几句: There's a lot that's been written lately about how the Web is puréeing people's gray matter. The most thorough take on the topic is Nicholas Carr’s new book, The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, but anyone who's been spending a lot of time surfing is probably going to be so distracted by e-mails and Facebook, etc., that he won't be able to finish the book. ※ 引述《alicezzz》之铭言： : Instead, he'll turn, with irony, to the Web, where he'll find plenty to read, : especially if he's looking for (1)it today: The New York Times has just ^^^ ↑ 所以我的问题(1)it 也可能是指Nicholas Carr's new book吗? 但是这样↑处，不就应该要是句号才对吗? 为什麽是冒号 ><? : published two stories, a blog post, and an interactive feature (2-1)arguing : that the electronic methods (2-2)by which they themselves are : (2-3)delivered are “intrusive, have increased [people's] levels of stress and have made it : difficult to concentrate.” : 疑问如下： : (1) : 这里的it 是指 The New York Times...concentrate. 这篇文章吗 : (2) : -1 arguing是 which is arguing 的简化吗? 可是非人怎麽会argue(解释为主张?) : -2 by which这句的还原如下，是吗? : They themselves are delivered.....concentrated” by the electronic methods. : -3 deliver 在这里怎麽解释阿? : (3) : 我对这段的理解如下，是对的吗? (因为其实看不太懂) : 讽刺的是，他会开始上网，并且在网路上发现一大堆可读的， : 特别是他今天所寻找的文章: 纽约时报已有两种网路出版品， : 一种是部落格，一种是互动媒材。 : 这种互动媒材自己也被视为「入侵的，会增加人的压力且造成不专心」 : == : 原文出处: http://0rz.tw/hMe9b : 感谢大家 Orz --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.134.38.124