作者spaceuit (0000000)
看板Eng-Class
標題[請益] chinese Eenglish
時間Fri Apr 30 19:27:45 2010
在平台演算法的驗證，本研究以呼吸氣流溫度比對平台演算法對於呼吸肌電訊號處理在
位置與呼吸數判斷的正確性，分別為98.9%與95.4%。而在特徵值的應用上，是以半自動
的方式做呼吸判斷，其正確率皆高於0.83%；
The accuracy of our method to determine whether there was respiratory signal
or not was assessed. One is the respiratory EMG processor on platform.
The signal after processing was checked by comparing the position and
respiratory count number with the air temperature signal in respiratory,
and the accuracy were 98.9% and 95.4% respectively. The other one is using
the eigenvalues. The accuracy was all above 0.83%, and they were checked by
semi-automatic method.
這是我ㄧ段文摘要的翻譯，但被評論為chinese English，板上的大大們，可以給予我
指導嗎???
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.135.100.111
1F：→ n3oanderson:如果是論文寫作, proofreading也許對你會比較有幫助. 04/30 21:45
2F：推 pelicanper:第一句的子句用there was...or not表示有 05/01 04:58
3F：→ pelicanper:respiratory signal才成立前面的accuracy 05/01 04:59
4F：→ pelicanper:看起來和中文意義不太符合 05/01 05:01
5F：→ pelicanper:The other one is using...另外一個是用... 05/01 05:02
6F：→ pelicanper:標準的Chinese English,應該The other is eigenvalues 05/01 05:03
7F：→ pelicanper:即可 05/01 05:03
8F：推 VIATOR:本來我想幫你翻，可是你的意思有點難理解 05/02 13:32
9F：推 VIATOR:很明顯的錯誤就是The accuracies were 98,9% and ... 05/02 13:37
10F：→ VIATOR:The accuracies were all above 83% 05/02 13:37
11F：→ VIATOR:我猜正確率應該是83%，而不是0.83% 05/02 13:38
12F：推 VIATOR:更正，是accuracy rates 05/02 13:41
13F：→ hoch:老實說，你要不要靜下來，把你的中文讀一遍。因為你的中文很 05/03 10:59
14F：→ hoch:難懂。 05/03 10:59
15F：→ hoch:更別提 "正確率只有0.83%"。這是高還是低？ 05/03 11:00