作者spaceuit (0000000)
看板Eng-Class
标题[请益] chinese Eenglish
时间Fri Apr 30 19:27:45 2010
在平台演算法的验证，本研究以呼吸气流温度比对平台演算法对於呼吸肌电讯号处理在
位置与呼吸数判断的正确性，分别为98.9%与95.4%。而在特徵值的应用上，是以半自动
的方式做呼吸判断，其正确率皆高於0.83%；
The accuracy of our method to determine whether there was respiratory signal
or not was assessed. One is the respiratory EMG processor on platform.
The signal after processing was checked by comparing the position and
respiratory count number with the air temperature signal in respiratory,
and the accuracy were 98.9% and 95.4% respectively. The other one is using
the eigenvalues. The accuracy was all above 0.83%, and they were checked by
semi-automatic method.
这是我ㄧ段文摘要的翻译，但被评论为chinese English，板上的大大们，可以给予我
指导吗???
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.135.100.111
1F：→ n3oanderson:如果是论文写作, proofreading也许对你会比较有帮助. 04/30 21:45
2F：推 pelicanper:第一句的子句用there was...or not表示有 05/01 04:58
3F：→ pelicanper:respiratory signal才成立前面的accuracy 05/01 04:59
4F：→ pelicanper:看起来和中文意义不太符合 05/01 05:01
5F：→ pelicanper:The other one is using...另外一个是用... 05/01 05:02
6F：→ pelicanper:标准的Chinese English,应该The other is eigenvalues 05/01 05:03
7F：→ pelicanper:即可 05/01 05:03
8F：推 VIATOR:本来我想帮你翻，可是你的意思有点难理解 05/02 13:32
9F：推 VIATOR:很明显的错误就是The accuracies were 98,9% and ... 05/02 13:37
10F：→ VIATOR:The accuracies were all above 83% 05/02 13:37
11F：→ VIATOR:我猜正确率应该是83%，而不是0.83% 05/02 13:38
12F：推 VIATOR:更正，是accuracy rates 05/02 13:41
13F：→ hoch:老实说，你要不要静下来，把你的中文读一遍。因为你的中文很 05/03 10:59
14F：→ hoch:难懂。 05/03 10:59
15F：→ hoch:更别提 "正确率只有0.83%"。这是高还是低？ 05/03 11:00