作者ashurali (折斷天使的翅膀)
看板Eng-Class
標題Re: [文法] 幾個句子
時間Mon Mar 1 21:04:44 2010
一些想法和查到的資料想和大家討論
※ 引述《invisibleya (inv)》之銘言:
: 1. Nutritionists recommend that each individual take sufficient amounts
: of vitamin C so that may he may not contract svurvy as well as other
: diseases attributed to the lack of the nutrient.
: 第一行中的take是否應該要用第三人稱單數 即takes
文法書中多半會提到下面幾個動詞用法有些特別:
┌ suggest ┐
│ propose │ ┌ should + infinitive
其句型是 S + │recommend│ + (that) + S + │ infinitive
│ insist │ └ V (past form)
└ demand ┘ [the subjunctive]
-----------------可以跳過-----------------
The subjunctive mood is a verb mood typically used in dependent clauses to
express a wish, emotion, possibility, judgment, opinion, necessity, or action
that has not yet occurred. (from Wikipedia)
[to own] [to be]
Present I own I
am
indicative he/she/it own
s he/she/it
is
we/you/they own we/you/they
are
Present I own I
be
subjunctive he/she/it
own he/she/it
be
we/you/they own we/you/they
be
Past I own
ed I
was
indicative he/she/it own
ed he/she/it
was
we/you/they own
ed we/you/they
ware
Past I own
ed I
were
subjunctive he/she/it
owned he/she/it
were
we/you/they
owned we/you/they
were
Future I
will/shall own I
will/shall be
indicative he/she/it
will own he/she/it
will be
we/you/they
will/shall own we/you/they
will be
Future I
were to own I
were to be
subjunctive he/she/it
were to own he/she/it
were to be
we/you/they
were to own we/you/they
were to be
-----------------可以跳過-----------------
所以題目中的take不需用takes
但我沒看到書上說這些動詞不允許用一般的that clause形式,也就是你寫的這個問題
不過我也沒看過說可以用的說法就是了,另外會有文法的題目將 -s 的選項視作錯的
補充一下,後面也不能 + somebody to do something,不像ask, tell
好像文法中也常考這個規則,但我也沒在書上看到為什麼不能用
另外suggestion/proposal/recommendation
important/vital/necessary/essential/desirable/imperative
後面也可以用that (should) infinitive的形式
例:What do you think of Jane's suggestion that I should buy a car?
It's essential that you should be here on time.
: 2. Historians are still mystified by the question how some ancient
: civiliztions disappeared suddenly in history.
: 第一行中的how為何不能使用why
這題是選項一個用how開頭,另一個用why起始嗎?
我自己是覺得這個的句子將how改成why意思僅改變一些
而且不管那些historians問how~或why~,簡單回答起來都差不多
: 3. __________, the cell bodies that control the heredity of an animal or
: a plant.
: (A) DNA is the chief material in chromosomes
: (B) The chief material in chromosomes is DNA
: (C) In chromosomes DNA is the chief material
: (D) In chromosomes the chief material is DNA
: 正確答案是A 想請問其他選項為何不行
這題除了問英文用法,也是考科學的想法吧 XD
就comma後面的敘述你覺得是指chromosome還是DNA
選擇那一個就將那個字放在comma前面
這個用法和平常說的同位語、關係代名詞的restrictive clause都是用來做為補充說明
會將要說明的該對象置於comma前
另外如果你能接受後面那個是指DNA的話,也就是將DNA放在comma前面
那(B)和(D)都可以了,但單複數需修正,而要用(C)的話,可以改成
In chromosomes DNA is the chief material that controls the heredity of ...
但就意思上到底是chromosome對,還是DNA,我覺得爭這個是沒多大意義就是了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.230.96.143
2F:→ dunchee:->4 ... (特別是後面的Note the difference between ...) 03/01 21:18
3F:→ dunchee:另外Michael Swan的"Practical English Usage"也有這方面 03/01 21:20
4F:→ dunchee:的解說(含那個"should"比較是屬於英式寫法會加的。美式的 03/01 21:21
5F:→ dunchee:通常不加) 03/01 21:21
6F:推 scream7:ㄚ...我該多讀點書了(低頭) 閣下說的才對 (=0=|||) 03/01 22:36