作者ashurali (折断天使的翅膀)
看板Eng-Class
标题Re: [文法] 几个句子
时间Mon Mar 1 21:04:44 2010
一些想法和查到的资料想和大家讨论
※ 引述《invisibleya (inv)》之铭言:
: 1. Nutritionists recommend that each individual take sufficient amounts
: of vitamin C so that may he may not contract svurvy as well as other
: diseases attributed to the lack of the nutrient.
: 第一行中的take是否应该要用第三人称单数 即takes
文法书中多半会提到下面几个动词用法有些特别:
┌ suggest ┐
│ propose │ ┌ should + infinitive
其句型是 S + │recommend│ + (that) + S + │ infinitive
│ insist │ └ V (past form)
└ demand ┘ [the subjunctive]
-----------------可以跳过-----------------
The subjunctive mood is a verb mood typically used in dependent clauses to
express a wish, emotion, possibility, judgment, opinion, necessity, or action
that has not yet occurred. (from Wikipedia)
[to own] [to be]
Present I own I
am
indicative he/she/it own
s he/she/it
is
we/you/they own we/you/they
are
Present I own I
be
subjunctive he/she/it
own he/she/it
be
we/you/they own we/you/they
be
Past I own
ed I
was
indicative he/she/it own
ed he/she/it
was
we/you/they own
ed we/you/they
ware
Past I own
ed I
were
subjunctive he/she/it
owned he/she/it
were
we/you/they
owned we/you/they
were
Future I
will/shall own I
will/shall be
indicative he/she/it
will own he/she/it
will be
we/you/they
will/shall own we/you/they
will be
Future I
were to own I
were to be
subjunctive he/she/it
were to own he/she/it
were to be
we/you/they
were to own we/you/they
were to be
-----------------可以跳过-----------------
所以题目中的take不需用takes
但我没看到书上说这些动词不允许用一般的that clause形式,也就是你写的这个问题
不过我也没看过说可以用的说法就是了,另外会有文法的题目将 -s 的选项视作错的
补充一下,後面也不能 + somebody to do something,不像ask, tell
好像文法中也常考这个规则,但我也没在书上看到为什麽不能用
另外suggestion/proposal/recommendation
important/vital/necessary/essential/desirable/imperative
後面也可以用that (should) infinitive的形式
例:What do you think of Jane's suggestion that I should buy a car?
It's essential that you should be here on time.
: 2. Historians are still mystified by the question how some ancient
: civiliztions disappeared suddenly in history.
: 第一行中的how为何不能使用why
这题是选项一个用how开头,另一个用why起始吗?
我自己是觉得这个的句子将how改成why意思仅改变一些
而且不管那些historians问how~或why~,简单回答起来都差不多
: 3. __________, the cell bodies that control the heredity of an animal or
: a plant.
: (A) DNA is the chief material in chromosomes
: (B) The chief material in chromosomes is DNA
: (C) In chromosomes DNA is the chief material
: (D) In chromosomes the chief material is DNA
: 正确答案是A 想请问其他选项为何不行
这题除了问英文用法,也是考科学的想法吧 XD
就comma後面的叙述你觉得是指chromosome还是DNA
选择那一个就将那个字放在comma前面
这个用法和平常说的同位语、关系代名词的restrictive clause都是用来做为补充说明
会将要说明的该对象置於comma前
另外如果你能接受後面那个是指DNA的话,也就是将DNA放在comma前面
那(B)和(D)都可以了,但单复数需修正,而要用(C)的话,可以改成
In chromosomes DNA is the chief material that controls the heredity of ...
但就意思上到底是chromosome对,还是DNA,我觉得争这个是没多大意义就是了
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.230.96.143
2F:→ dunchee:->4 ... (特别是後面的Note the difference between ...) 03/01 21:18
3F:→ dunchee:另外Michael Swan的"Practical English Usage"也有这方面 03/01 21:20
4F:→ dunchee:的解说(含那个"should"比较是属於英式写法会加的。美式的 03/01 21:21
5F:→ dunchee:通常不加) 03/01 21:21
6F:推 scream7:ㄚ...我该多读点书了(低头) 阁下说的才对 (=0=|||) 03/01 22:36