※ 引述《gitilin (小朋友立正)》之銘言： : : 兩句是相反的意思，何以someone是hobbyist的關係代名詞呢？ : 你必須把整句看完 原文是: : "am I doomed to forever be on the "hobbyist" track, someone for whom real : mastery, and therefore preparation for it, is not even up for consideration?" : 前一句 am I doomed to be on the hobbyist track?(永遠是業餘玩家） : 與後一句 (Am I doomed to be)someone for whom real mastery, and therefore : preparation for it, is not even up for consideration? : (是否注定成為與專業與準備無緣的人) 並不是相反的意思。 喔喔，我發現我在這裡的盲點了～ 要把someone後面的句子都當成一整句來看才對， 我之前都一直以為是 am I doomed to be on the hobbyist track , (therefore)someone for whom real mastery, and therefore preparation for it, is not even up for consideration? 其實這個therefore應該要替換成 am I doomed to be 才對，是這樣吧？ 搞錯這兩個句子之間的關係了，不是因果關係，而是並列的子句？ : for whom是指對這個人,對這個someone來說 : real mastery, and preparation for real mastery,專業與對其的準備 : is not even up for consideration.都不列入考慮 所以如果還原成原句的話，應該是 Real mastery and preparation for it is not even up for consideration for her/him. 是這樣嗎？ 哦～～我懂了！終於懂了～～～ 謝謝你!!^^ --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.21.105.61