※ 引述《gitilin (小朋友立正)》之铭言： : : 两句是相反的意思，何以someone是hobbyist的关系代名词呢？ : 你必须把整句看完 原文是: : "am I doomed to forever be on the "hobbyist" track, someone for whom real : mastery, and therefore preparation for it, is not even up for consideration?" : 前一句 am I doomed to be on the hobbyist track?(永远是业余玩家） : 与後一句 (Am I doomed to be)someone for whom real mastery, and therefore : preparation for it, is not even up for consideration? : (是否注定成为与专业与准备无缘的人) 并不是相反的意思。 喔喔，我发现我在这里的盲点了～ 要把someone後面的句子都当成一整句来看才对， 我之前都一直以为是 am I doomed to be on the hobbyist track , (therefore)someone for whom real mastery, and therefore preparation for it, is not even up for consideration? 其实这个therefore应该要替换成 am I doomed to be 才对，是这样吧？ 搞错这两个句子之间的关系了，不是因果关系，而是并列的子句？ : for whom是指对这个人,对这个someone来说 : real mastery, and preparation for real mastery,专业与对其的准备 : is not even up for consideration.都不列入考虑 所以如果还原成原句的话，应该是 Real mastery and preparation for it is not even up for consideration for her/him. 是这样吗？ 哦～～我懂了！终於懂了～～～ 谢谢你!!^^ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.21.105.61