作者lifegetter (白浪)
看板translator
标题Re: [徵求] 报价_笔_英译中_企管统计_四页_20090717
时间Tue Jul 14 08:23:51 2009
※ 引述《leonado (昵称)》之铭言：
: ──────────────────────────────────────
: [选]试 译 文：
: AIMS OF THE PRESENT STUDY
: An integrated model based on the literature review and hypotheses generated
: above is imultaneously tested in the present study. The research aims to
: contribute to the both the employee well being and service climate
: literature. The model tested examines the predicted associations between
: service climate and job induced tension,job satisfaction and psychological
: dysfunction as indicators of employee wellbeing. This investigation is
: undertaken in the context of the university environment where it is argued
: that the increasing ‘consumerisation’ of students may be a source of job
: pressure for university staff.
试改写：
Research Goals
This paper contributes to the literature on employee well being as well as
service climate through testing the integrated model described in the earlier
sections. A study is conducted in a university to examine the associations
between service climate and job-induced tension, using job satisfaction and
psychological dysfunctions as indicators; and the findings suggest that the
increasing "consumerisation" of students may be a cause for job pressure on
university staff.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
※ 编辑: lifegetter 来自: 210.240.249.200 (07/14 08:52)
1F：→ lifegetter:做什麽，怎麽做，结果...绪论是背景：为什麽要做 07/14 08:55
2F：→ pepejaja:改的真好.... 07/14 12:38
3F：→ lifegetter:哈哈，所以老外的英文一样有改进的空间 XD 07/14 13:08
4F：→ leonado:你写的我比较看的懂耶.... 07/14 13:16
5F：→ pepejaja:简洁有力啊..不过都是可以得懂!!! 07/14 14:08
6F：推 jubilee:我觉得原文还蛮Chinglish的耶....原作者可能是华人? 07/14 15:55
7F：→ lifegetter:Angela Martin, U of Tasmaria 澳洲 07/14 17:30
9F：推 BBMak:我也觉得原来文章写法似乎也满常见的，只是繁琐了点 07/14 17:43
10F：→ lifegetter:恩，如：将错误讯息经搜寻正确资料并取代之 ==> 修正 07/14 17:47
11F：→ lifegetter:这...照原文字数计费就比较划算 XD 07/14 17:49
12F：→ usread:研究活动与研究结果宜用过去式.现在式主在「真理」 07/14 20:14
13F：→ lifegetter:恩，a study was conducted. 07/14 20:32
14F：→ usread:yes,研究论文的主要时态是过去式,这一点要把握住 07/14 20:52
15F：推 bigbuddha:其实我觉得原文写得比较好 只是有一些typos就是 07/14 21:09
16F：推 bigbuddha:如(s)imultaneously 与 contribute to (删the) both the 07/14 21:12
17F：→ lifegetter:论文该用的时态基本上有两种看法，一个就是 usread 所 07/15 20:53
18F：→ lifegetter:说的。我常用的是「真理」与「模型描述」用现在式，过 07/15 20:54
19F：→ lifegetter:程描述（如实验过程）用过去式。所以很可能在「描述该 07/15 20:55
20F：→ lifegetter:做什麽」时会用现在式，然後「以实验为例」的描述时又 07/15 20:56
21F：→ lifegetter:变成过去式。我想这两种时态变换并不彼此抵触，而在审 07/15 20:58
22F：→ lifegetter:稿过程不见得会有严重影响（minor revision 或期刊有专 07/15 21:00
23F：→ lifegetter:人小修文法）。但是因果混杂的写法会造成审稿者的困扰 07/15 21:01
24F：→ lifegetter:或误解，很可能会以「很难看懂」一下刷掉或列入 major 07/15 21:02
25F：→ lifegetter:revision。目前看到台湾论文的罩门就是这混杂不清。 XD 07/15 21:03
26F：→ lifegetter:小小八卦，有些期刊主编会把夹杂不清的稿件丢给专业大 07/15 21:06
27F：→ lifegetter:刀来砍，很可能被砍後只能收到「要分清因果」的回应。 07/15 21:07
28F：→ lifegetter:像这篇文章（没去仔细审，因为已发表了 XD）我会建议作 07/15 21:09
29F：→ lifegetter:者以简洁些的句型撰写，而有些在邀稿文中就会这样要求 07/15 21:11