※ 引述《Satyria (零分!零分!)》之铭言： : 刚刚在高中版看到有人去面试台大哲学的心得 : 其中考了一题苏格拉底的名言： : 苏拉底说"我所知道的就是我一无所知"，既然他一无所知，他又怎麽知道他一无所知？ : 我自己想了蛮久的，但没有答案 : 好像逻辑部份会有点怪怪的＝　＝ : 讨论一下各位的心得吧～ From the start, we have to realize that since we are not Socrates himself, we cannot absolutely what it's like to think like he does. O. K. Then let us imagine if it were us ourself who said, "The only thing I am sure of is that I am ignorant." Every identity is equipped with various sets of signal receivers, such as the eye for electromagnetic waves-light, the ear for gas molecule vibration, etc. A philosopher should be satisfied with what he's perceived, to call a spade a spade. The problem is when an intelligent species has been transmitted large enough body of information, whose brain perhaps spontaneous begins to trace the possible correlation of them, to find the logic. The reason is probably to be economical--let's assume that our brain's capacity is with a limitation (actually of course it cannot be augmented forever, since everything which has a beginning must also has an end). So now a data unit was sent in, to be stored at some locus; then another came, put at another....Then certain critical point was reached--there's no more available space for newcomers! So the brain is forced to re-evaluate its database connection networks, categorizing them based on apparent interrelationship between them, or even discriminations, discrepancy between them, just like the vocabulary's signication in a language is constructed out of their textuality within. So the problem may lie in the language... (To be continued.) --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.25.118.134