作者humbler (兽人H)
看板Eng-Class
标题[请益] 此句话的含意
时间Sat Jun 10 21:19:11 2017
If it's an area where there's been litigation in the past,lawyers will
think about, when courts considered this issue, ora similar issue in the
past,what did they say about this issue?How did they interpret the language
of the statute,if that's what it's ultimately controlling?What do the
precedents say?And then lawyers also make appeals to considerations of what
made good policy.
这段话中有两句话的意思我不太懂，
想请问各位高手我这样解释对不对：
1.
if that's what it's ultimately controlling?
(这解释是否是最终掌控的关键呢？)
2.
then lawyer also make appeals to considerations of what made good policy.
(然後律师也会开始诉诸考虑好的诉讼策略)
what made good policy 这句意思我不懂，还有为什麽要用made过去式，而不是现在式呢？
麻烦各位指点，谢谢
--
如果还有来世，我想当一个兽人
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 114.43.189.216
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Eng-Class/M.1497100754.A.DD0.html