※ 引述《ronan001 ("宅"猫)》之铭言： : 今天学长问了我一句英文句子 : 讨论後还是没一个所以然，所以想问版上大大们 : 那句子如下： : the numbers are a potent reminder that it is not the stability of the : exchange rate that will determine china’s future, but the stability within : its own borders : 这句还满奇怪的 : 通常真主词部分不是应该会有个主词在前面吗? : 但是他直接就接了will determine china's future : 感觉不太对 : 但是除了虚主词的句型我想不太出来还有什麽可能性 : 我有想过~会不会是 potent reminder才是真主词 : 不过这样好像也怪怪的..... : 不知道版上大大们有没有其他的看法 the numbers are a potent reminder 主词+be动词+主词补语，完整句子完成 that it is not the stability of the exchange rate that will determine china’s future, but the stability within its own borders (这里的that不是代替reminder， 不是关代，且後面接完整句子，应该是that子句，当名词用，就是指前面的 a potent reminder，用法跟 the fact that+子句，相同) 至於下面这句 it is not the stability of the exchange rate that will determine china's future 应该是表示强调的分裂句=> It is 要强调的字 that ...... 例 : I like Mary. 要强调玛丽变成It is Mary that I like. I stayed up yesterday.要强调昨天变成It is yesterday that I stayed up. 原句 应是 The stability of the exchange rate will determine China's future. 要强调汇率的稳定就变成 => It is the stability of the exchange rate that will determine China's future. 然後改成否定+not 後面那个but和前面的not是一组的，not.....but....(不是....而是.....) --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 112.104.162.104