感謝回應者熱心的意見 本人還有一些疑惑(同一篇文章)望各位不吝指教 (4) Even where the initiative of referendums is restricted to State organs, there are actually numerous important differences between the constitutions of the countries concerned, and different constitutional provisions may have different impacts on the management of political conflicts between constitutional bodies, even if referendums are at stake in each case. ^^^^^^^^ 我的翻譯：甚至在限於國家機關始能發動公民投票的地方，實際上這些國家的憲法規 定仍有許多重大的差異之處，而不同的憲法規定可能會對憲法機關間政治衝突的處理 有不同的影響，即使公民投票在個案中"at stake" ^^^^^^^^ 應如何適切翻譯? (5) When major constitutional rules are not affected, a referendum may be called in Estonia only if there was substantial support in the Parliament for the amendments, a very high threshold. 我的翻譯：在愛沙尼亞，若主要憲法規定不受影響，只有在國會相當支持修憲時， 才可發動公投，是一個高門檻。 (6)To draw some conclusions from our analysis, we must underline that the organisers of our conference correctly referred to referendums (in the plural) instead of a referendum (in the singular). 我的翻譯：為我們的分析下些結論，我們必須強調本會議的成員正確地參考了複數 公投而非只針對單一公投。 (7)還有一個很難查到的單字 "plebiscitarian" --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 124.218.98.127