※ 引述《fightback (to be)》之銘言： : My course of English Composition requires us to submit : a research paper with a certain topic. : I'd like to write about Homeric question with the conclusion : that Homer didn't exist. Accordingly, the idea flashes into my head. : I think of whether Shakespeare did exist that probably is usful to : support the thesis statement I want after my making the comparison and : analysis between Homer and Shkaespeare. : However, I have the problem that I'm not sure I did read the relevant : material, or why can't I find that kind of information now. : Can anybody give me a hand to tell me : is there the Shakespearian question with references if possible. : Homer是否存在為爭議性的話題 : 有些學者認為Homer不過是個被創造出來的名詞以解釋 : Iliad and Odyssey作品的存在 : 這就是所謂的Homeric question. : 同樣的 我印象中好像讀過Shakespear也有被質疑 : 是否真有其人 或 眾多劇本是否真為他所作 : 有些人提出 "Shakespeare" 不過是個眾多無名小卒作品的掛名 : 我想請問: : 關莎士比亞這部分是我印象錯誤還是真的有此說? : 如果不是我印象錯誤的話 但好像又找不到"莎翁被質疑是否存在"相關資料 : 能否請眾板友提供一下這方面資料. 有人提出很多假設 說莎士比亞本身並沒有寫這些東西. 有人說那些劇本其實是Bacon寫的, 有人說是Ben Johson寫的; 不過這些假設其實也都很片面 比真有莎士比亞其實人的證據少很多很多. 台灣書店好像可以找到一本書 叫做"莎士比亞不存在?"之類的. 不過我覺得, we don't have to buy the whole story. or, just like postmodernism may lead us to ask, what's an author and what's a text, so what's Shakespeare? what ARE Shakespeares? -- 縱然陽光可以帶給人們希望 但也要心中充滿希望 才看得到陽光!! --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.224.52.148