作者julians (Echophilia)
看板poetry
标题Re: Homer and Shakespeare
时间Fri May 20 14:55:29 2005
※ 引述《fightback (to be)》之铭言:
: My course of English Composition requires us to submit
: a research paper with a certain topic.
: I'd like to write about Homeric question with the conclusion
: that Homer didn't exist. Accordingly, the idea flashes into my head.
: I think of whether Shakespeare did exist that probably is usful to
: support the thesis statement I want after my making the comparison and
: analysis between Homer and Shkaespeare.
: However, I have the problem that I'm not sure I did read the relevant
: material, or why can't I find that kind of information now.
: Can anybody give me a hand to tell me
: is there the Shakespearian question with references if possible.
: Homer是否存在为争议性的话题
: 有些学者认为Homer不过是个被创造出来的名词以解释
: Iliad and Odyssey作品的存在
: 这就是所谓的Homeric question.
: 同样的 我印象中好像读过Shakespear也有被质疑
: 是否真有其人 或 众多剧本是否真为他所作
: 有些人提出 "Shakespeare" 不过是个众多无名小卒作品的挂名
: 我想请问:
: 关莎士比亚这部分是我印象错误还是真的有此说?
: 如果不是我印象错误的话 但好像又找不到"莎翁被质疑是否存在"相关资料
: 能否请众板友提供一下这方面资料.
有人提出很多假设
说莎士比亚本身并没有写这些东西.
有人说那些剧本其实是Bacon写的, 有人说是Ben Johson写的;
不过这些假设其实也都很片面
比真有莎士比亚其实人的证据少很多很多.
台湾书店好像可以找到一本书
叫做"莎士比亚不存在?"之类的.
不过我觉得,
we don't have to buy the whole story.
or, just like postmodernism may lead us to ask,
what's an author and what's a text,
so what's Shakespeare?
what ARE Shakespeares?
--
纵然阳光可以带给人们希望
但也要心中充满希望
才看得到阳光!!
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.224.52.148
1F:推 fightback:thx220.136.126.191 05/20