作者KAGI (天涯何處無芳草)
看板media-chaos
標題Re: 紐約時報一記者專門自製新聞被炒魷魚
時間Tue May 13 13:50:04 2003
紐約時報針對此事
在其版面上做了以下的處置
***
CORRECTING THE RECORD :
Times Reporter Who Resigned Leaves Long Trail of Deception (10頁的篇幅)
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11PAPE.html
This article was reported and written by Dan Barry, David Barstow,
Jonathan D. Glater, Adam Liptak and Jacques Steinberg.
Research support was provided by Alain Delaqu廨i鋨e and Carolyn Wilder.
Readers with information about other articles by Jayson Blair that may be
false wholly or in part are asked to e-mail The Times:
[email protected].
與此相關的還有：
Witnesses and Documents Unveil Deceptions in a Reporter's Work (May 11, 2003)
By THE NEW YORK TIMES ( 9頁的篇幅 )
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11VERI.html
Articles by Jayson Blair Since Late October, 2002
(把該記者以往的報導都翻出來 )
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/national/BLAIR-ARCHIVE.html
Editors' Note (May 11, 2003)
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/pageoneplus/11EDIT.html
READERS' OPINIONS
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?50@@.f267443
***
紐約時報對這件事的坦率處置值得學習
台灣的媒體什麼時候才能做到紐約時報這種地步？？
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 218.166.133.73
1F：→ angryche:如果都比照辦理.這行業會缺人力阿 推 218.160.33.225 05/13
2F：→ KAGI:1.這種事應該不是常態 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
3F：→ KAGI:2.NYTimes將此事當重大新聞處理,所以這些 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
4F：→ KAGI:人力比照重大新聞採訪兵團的規格.這種戰力 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
5F：→ KAGI:的人力配置,媒體在平常應該就有規劃演練過 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
6F：→ KAGI:否則何以因應各類突發與重大的新聞發生? 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
7F：→ KAGI:所以,端視媒體有沒有心像NYTimes這麼幹. 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
8F：→ KAGI:3.何況這種事攸關媒體自身的信譽.公信力是 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
9F：→ KAGI:傳媒最重要的資產,值得此規格處理以挽回閱 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
10F：→ KAGI:聽眾的信賴.所以NYTimes做對了,值得效法. 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
11F：→ angryche:其實我的意思是諷刺說 如果台灣比照辦理 推 140.118.6.33 05/13
12F：→ angryche:不是被抓到人力大減 就是道歉篇幅得刊月餘 推 140.118.6.33 05/13