作者KAGI (天涯何处无芳草)
看板media-chaos
标题Re: 纽约时报一记者专门自制新闻被炒鱿鱼
时间Tue May 13 13:50:04 2003
纽约时报针对此事
在其版面上做了以下的处置
***
CORRECTING THE RECORD :
Times Reporter Who Resigned Leaves Long Trail of Deception (10页的篇幅)
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11PAPE.html
This article was reported and written by Dan Barry, David Barstow,
Jonathan D. Glater, Adam Liptak and Jacques Steinberg.
Research support was provided by Alain Delaqu廨i锇e and Carolyn Wilder.
Readers with information about other articles by Jayson Blair that may be
false wholly or in part are asked to e-mail The Times:
[email protected].
与此相关的还有：
Witnesses and Documents Unveil Deceptions in a Reporter's Work (May 11, 2003)
By THE NEW YORK TIMES ( 9页的篇幅 )
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11VERI.html
Articles by Jayson Blair Since Late October, 2002
(把该记者以往的报导都翻出来 )
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/national/BLAIR-ARCHIVE.html
Editors' Note (May 11, 2003)
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/pageoneplus/11EDIT.html
READERS' OPINIONS
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?50@@.f267443
***
纽约时报对这件事的坦率处置值得学习
台湾的媒体什麽时候才能做到纽约时报这种地步？？
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 218.166.133.73
1F：→ angryche:如果都比照办理.这行业会缺人力阿 推 218.160.33.225 05/13
2F：→ KAGI:1.这种事应该不是常态 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
3F：→ KAGI:2.NYTimes将此事当重大新闻处理,所以这些 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
4F：→ KAGI:人力比照重大新闻采访兵团的规格.这种战力 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
5F：→ KAGI:的人力配置,媒体在平常应该就有规划演练过 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
6F：→ KAGI:否则何以因应各类突发与重大的新闻发生? 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
7F：→ KAGI:所以,端视媒体有没有心像NYTimes这麽干. 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
8F：→ KAGI:3.何况这种事攸关媒体自身的信誉.公信力是 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
9F：→ KAGI:传媒最重要的资产,值得此规格处理以挽回阅 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
10F：→ KAGI:听众的信赖.所以NYTimes做对了,值得效法. 推 218.166.133.73 05/13
11F：→ angryche:其实我的意思是讽刺说 如果台湾比照办理 推 140.118.6.33 05/13
12F：→ angryche:不是被抓到人力大减 就是道歉篇幅得刊月余 推 140.118.6.33 05/13