clmusic 板


LINE

※ 引述《Piaf (...)》之銘言: : Schalk: You don't want absolutely rigid tempi, do you? : Bruckner: No, of course not. : Schalk: Right! Leave it to us. The tempi indication issue is still debated in the past 60 years, and of course has not come to a conclusion yet. Let's see what the Bruckner scholars said on this problem. Dr. Deryk Cooke, the most famous advocate of the Haas Edition, thought that the tempi indication, such as the scattered "ritard-a tempo" pairs, are particular harmful since thry destroy the natural flow of the music. ("The Bruckner Problem Simplified", The Muisical Newsletter Inc, NY, 1975) Dr. Cooke regarded this tempi indications as simply Nikisch's "conductor's markings", and absolutely have no place in Bruckner's score. On the contrary, Dr. william Carragan said that the ritards in the finale are authentic, and it's not optional. (In his opinion, the cymbal clash in the Adagio is optional, just a matter of taste.) ("The Bruckner Versions, Once More", American Record Guide, March 1995) One major discrepancy between Dr. Haas and Dr. Nowak, is that Dr. Haas wanted only one version for each symphony so he combined materials from different versions; however Dr. Nowak thought that the different revisions should be published separately. For example, the eighth symphony, we have 1887 Nowak version, and the 1890 Nowak version, but only one 1887-1890 Haas Edition. Different scholars have different comments on Bruckner's personal character too. Dr. Carragan thought that Bruckner has a radical(!) and forward-looking view of what symphonic music should be, while Dr. Cooke said that Bruckner did not possessed the "normal" self-confidence of the great composer. In my observation, it seems that the elder scholars, such as Dr. Cooke, Dr. Simpson, and Dr. Doernberg are more fond/pro the Haas Edition, while the younger scholar's are more likely in favor of the Nowak Edition, such as Dr. Carraga, and Dr. Korstvedt. What's funny is that, these Brucknerian are either from UK or from US. -- Piaf @ PTT; klem/Dutchman elsewhere. --



※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 141.212.126.245
1F:→ Fassbaender:真是好文啊~ 推 163.29.8.206 01/31
2F:→ ckscorsese:感謝 受教了 推 218.166.91.85 01/31







like.gif 您可能會有興趣的文章
icon.png[問題/行為] 貓晚上進房間會不會有憋尿問題
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] 選了錯誤的女孩成為魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一張
icon.png[心得] EMS高領長版毛衣.墨小樓MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龍隔熱紙GE55+33+22
icon.png[問題] 清洗洗衣機
icon.png[尋物] 窗台下的空間
icon.png[閒聊] 双極の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售車] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四門
icon.png[討論] 能從照片感受到攝影者心情嗎
icon.png[狂賀] 賀賀賀賀 賀!島村卯月!總選舉NO.1
icon.png[難過] 羨慕白皮膚的女生
icon.png閱讀文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[問題] SBK S1安裝於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 舊woo100絕版開箱!!
icon.pngRe: [無言] 關於小包衛生紙
icon.png[開箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 簡單測試
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 執行者16PT
icon.png[售車] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑戰33 LV10 獅子座pt solo
icon.png[閒聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主購教學
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量產版官方照無預警流出
icon.png[售車] Golf 4 2.0 銀色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提籃汽座(有底座)2000元誠可議
icon.png[問題] 請問補牙材質掉了還能再補嗎?(台中半年內
icon.png[問題] 44th 單曲 生寫竟然都給重複的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 華南紅卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[問題] 拔牙矯正這樣正常嗎
icon.png[贈送] 老莫高業 初業 102年版
icon.png[情報] 三大行動支付 本季掀戰火
icon.png[寶寶] 博客來Amos水蠟筆5/1特價五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鮮人一些面試分享
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二創漫畫翻譯
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] OGN中場影片:失蹤人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[問題] 台灣大哥大4G訊號差
icon.png[出售] [全國]全新千尋侘草LED燈, 水草

請輸入看板名稱,例如:e-shopping站內搜尋

TOP