clmusic 板


LINE

※ 引述《Piaf (...)》之铭言: : Schalk: You don't want absolutely rigid tempi, do you? : Bruckner: No, of course not. : Schalk: Right! Leave it to us. The tempi indication issue is still debated in the past 60 years, and of course has not come to a conclusion yet. Let's see what the Bruckner scholars said on this problem. Dr. Deryk Cooke, the most famous advocate of the Haas Edition, thought that the tempi indication, such as the scattered "ritard-a tempo" pairs, are particular harmful since thry destroy the natural flow of the music. ("The Bruckner Problem Simplified", The Muisical Newsletter Inc, NY, 1975) Dr. Cooke regarded this tempi indications as simply Nikisch's "conductor's markings", and absolutely have no place in Bruckner's score. On the contrary, Dr. william Carragan said that the ritards in the finale are authentic, and it's not optional. (In his opinion, the cymbal clash in the Adagio is optional, just a matter of taste.) ("The Bruckner Versions, Once More", American Record Guide, March 1995) One major discrepancy between Dr. Haas and Dr. Nowak, is that Dr. Haas wanted only one version for each symphony so he combined materials from different versions; however Dr. Nowak thought that the different revisions should be published separately. For example, the eighth symphony, we have 1887 Nowak version, and the 1890 Nowak version, but only one 1887-1890 Haas Edition. Different scholars have different comments on Bruckner's personal character too. Dr. Carragan thought that Bruckner has a radical(!) and forward-looking view of what symphonic music should be, while Dr. Cooke said that Bruckner did not possessed the "normal" self-confidence of the great composer. In my observation, it seems that the elder scholars, such as Dr. Cooke, Dr. Simpson, and Dr. Doernberg are more fond/pro the Haas Edition, while the younger scholar's are more likely in favor of the Nowak Edition, such as Dr. Carraga, and Dr. Korstvedt. What's funny is that, these Brucknerian are either from UK or from US. -- Piaf @ PTT; klem/Dutchman elsewhere. --



※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 141.212.126.245
1F:→ Fassbaender:真是好文啊~ 推 163.29.8.206 01/31
2F:→ ckscorsese:感谢 受教了 推 218.166.91.85 01/31







like.gif 您可能会有兴趣的文章
icon.png[问题/行为] 猫晚上进房间会不会有憋尿问题
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] 选了错误的女孩成为魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一张
icon.png[心得] EMS高领长版毛衣.墨小楼MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龙隔热纸GE55+33+22
icon.png[问题] 清洗洗衣机
icon.png[寻物] 窗台下的空间
icon.png[闲聊] 双极の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售车] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四门
icon.png[讨论] 能从照片感受到摄影者心情吗
icon.png[狂贺] 贺贺贺贺 贺!岛村卯月!总选举NO.1
icon.png[难过] 羡慕白皮肤的女生
icon.png阅读文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[问题] SBK S1安装於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 旧woo100绝版开箱!!
icon.pngRe: [无言] 关於小包卫生纸
icon.png[开箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 简单测试
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 执行者16PT
icon.png[售车] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑战33 LV10 狮子座pt solo
icon.png[闲聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主购教学
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量产版官方照无预警流出
icon.png[售车] Golf 4 2.0 银色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提篮汽座(有底座)2000元诚可议
icon.png[问题] 请问补牙材质掉了还能再补吗?(台中半年内
icon.png[问题] 44th 单曲 生写竟然都给重复的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 华南红卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[问题] 拔牙矫正这样正常吗
icon.png[赠送] 老莫高业 初业 102年版
icon.png[情报] 三大行动支付 本季掀战火
icon.png[宝宝] 博客来Amos水蜡笔5/1特价五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鲜人一些面试分享
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二创漫画翻译
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] OGN中场影片:失踪人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[问题] 台湾大哥大4G讯号差
icon.png[出售] [全国]全新千寻侘草LED灯, 水草

请输入看板名称,例如:WOW站内搜寻

TOP