As I wrote on FTR FB earlier, yesterday I missed the QA, because there was nothing to translate. 　昨天沒有發Q&A是因為沒啥可說的 If you want, Overlord is collecting feedback on World of Warplanes – how do you like it? 　Overlord 正在收集 WoWp 的玩家反應 - SerB is fine with the performance of old premium/reward tanks, such as the Ram II, Matilda LL, T14, A32 and Panzer S35 　SerB對那些出了很久的金幣/活動車輛的表現感到滿意，像是Ram II、Matilda LL、T14 、A32 和 Panzer S35 - spall liner will have no effect, if a HE shell splash (or blast itself) hits a zone, where there is no armor (like on the open-topped new German 　TD ’s) – SerB states that it reduces damage proportionally to armor and when the armor is 0, the reduction is also 0 – spall liner doesn’t reduce the damage of complete penetrations (SS: BUT the improved saving throw for crew will still work) 　沒裝甲的地方（被高爆彈擊中或波及）防破片內襯是不會有作用的：SerB 表示內襯是 依裝甲厚度的一定比例降低傷害，沒裝甲就沒減傷。如果被擊穿的話防破片內襯也無法減 傷（SS: 但是對組員減傷的加成效果仍有效） - camo factor of the WT E-100 and RhB WT won’t be commented on (SS: a player asked whether WT E-100 has worse armor than Maus) 　不討論 WT E-100 和 RhB WT 隱蔽值的問題（SS: 有人在問 WT E-100 的裝甲是不是比 Maus 的還低） - apparently the frequency of server checks (synch of client and server) is 0,1s on average 　伺服端和客戶端同步的頻率平均是0.1秒 （譯：就算平均是0.1s，該掉封包狂lag的還是逃不掉啊…） - actually, a gun module apparently consists of two modules: an internal part and the external part (SS: that means the breech of the gun has 0 armor and is subjected to saving throws only, which means guns with a HUGE breech, like the Sturer Emil, can get its gun damaged even by being hit on the side armor 　主砲的模組是由兩部份組成：內部（砲膛）和外部（砲管）模組（SS: 砲膛沒有裝甲值 只能靠免傷機制，這表示像 Sturer Emil 這樣砲膛很大的車就算側面中彈也會壞砲） （譯：上圖最清楚http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/breech.jpg） - SerB states that the developers never planned to introduce +/-1 MM spread, because it’s not needed – for example in such a case the T-34/76 couldn’t face the Tiger 　SerB 表示開發人員從沒打算引進±1分房，因為根本沒必要。舉例來說 T-34/76 碰不到 虎式 - for now there are no details on the transfer of E-50 to tier 10, SerB states it is just one of the ideas 　目前沒有「把 E-50 提到十階」的進一部消息，SerB 說那只是個想法。 - penetrating the tank wrecks with partial penetration loss will not come in forseeable future 　可預見的未來內不會實裝讓殘骸可以被打穿的系統 （譯：靠殘骸藏下體賣頭的車安啦） - there is a separate collision model for a live tank and separate (simplified) model for a wreck 　還活著的戰車有分離的碰撞模組，殘骸的分離模組是簡化過的。 - Q: “We’ve seen Yuri Pasholok’s post on the 88mm L/71 autoloader, will we see it in Jagdpanther and King Tiger?” A: “It won’t fit in KT” (SS: its implementation into Jagdpanther is thus not excluded) 　問：「長88的自動填彈機會出現在獵豹和虎王上嗎？」答：「塞不進虎王裡。」（SS: 沒說不會裝在獵豹上呦～） - tank hulls (both life tanks and wrecks) do not serve as a visibility obstacle (SS: a huge stone will block spotchecks, a tank won’t) – this rule however doesn’t apparently apply on the “object” wrecks, that are a part of the map (SS: for example the burning Malinovka Panther near northern base) – these do count as obstacles 　車體不會遮蔽視線判定，不管是活著還是殘骸。但是在地圖上做成戰車殘骸狀的障礙物 件不適用這規則（SS: 例如 Malinovka 北方基地旁的豹式殘骸） PS: WG EU really did it! Fail hattrick this Friday – if you open WoT launcher and click on the TRIPLE EXPERIENCE FOR THE FIRST VICTORY – you won’ t end on WoT page, you’ll end up on World of Warplanes portal. How terrible. 　PS: WG EU 真的這樣搞了！如果打開 WoT launcher 點「首勝三倍經驗」超連結，不會 到 WoT 頁面，而會進入 WoWp 的入口網站——失敗的耍人把戲；好貼蘿蔔… 原文：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/22/22-11-2013/ -- In church, they say to forgive! Forgiveness is between them and God; it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.160.166.14 ※ 編輯: WillieHuang 來自: 118.160.166.14 (11/23 03:19)