As I wrote on FTR FB earlier, yesterday I missed the QA, because there was nothing to translate. 　昨天没有发Q&A是因为没啥可说的 If you want, Overlord is collecting feedback on World of Warplanes – how do you like it? 　Overlord 正在收集 WoWp 的玩家反应 - SerB is fine with the performance of old premium/reward tanks, such as the Ram II, Matilda LL, T14, A32 and Panzer S35 　SerB对那些出了很久的金币/活动车辆的表现感到满意，像是Ram II、Matilda LL、T14 、A32 和 Panzer S35 - spall liner will have no effect, if a HE shell splash (or blast itself) hits a zone, where there is no armor (like on the open-topped new German 　TD ’s) – SerB states that it reduces damage proportionally to armor and when the armor is 0, the reduction is also 0 – spall liner doesn’t reduce the damage of complete penetrations (SS: BUT the improved saving throw for crew will still work) 　没装甲的地方（被高爆弹击中或波及）防破片内衬是不会有作用的：SerB 表示内衬是 依装甲厚度的一定比例降低伤害，没装甲就没减伤。如果被击穿的话防破片内衬也无法减 伤（SS: 但是对组员减伤的加成效果仍有效） - camo factor of the WT E-100 and RhB WT won’t be commented on (SS: a player asked whether WT E-100 has worse armor than Maus) 　不讨论 WT E-100 和 RhB WT 隐蔽值的问题（SS: 有人在问 WT E-100 的装甲是不是比 Maus 的还低） - apparently the frequency of server checks (synch of client and server) is 0,1s on average 　伺服端和客户端同步的频率平均是0.1秒 （译：就算平均是0.1s，该掉封包狂lag的还是逃不掉啊…） - actually, a gun module apparently consists of two modules: an internal part and the external part (SS: that means the breech of the gun has 0 armor and is subjected to saving throws only, which means guns with a HUGE breech, like the Sturer Emil, can get its gun damaged even by being hit on the side armor 　主炮的模组是由两部份组成：内部（炮膛）和外部（炮管）模组（SS: 炮膛没有装甲值 只能靠免伤机制，这表示像 Sturer Emil 这样炮膛很大的车就算侧面中弹也会坏炮） （译：上图最清楚http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/breech.jpg） - SerB states that the developers never planned to introduce +/-1 MM spread, because it’s not needed – for example in such a case the T-34/76 couldn’t face the Tiger 　SerB 表示开发人员从没打算引进±1分房，因为根本没必要。举例来说 T-34/76 碰不到 虎式 - for now there are no details on the transfer of E-50 to tier 10, SerB states it is just one of the ideas 　目前没有「把 E-50 提到十阶」的进一部消息，SerB 说那只是个想法。 - penetrating the tank wrecks with partial penetration loss will not come in forseeable future 　可预见的未来内不会实装让残骸可以被打穿的系统 （译：靠残骸藏下体卖头的车安啦） - there is a separate collision model for a live tank and separate (simplified) model for a wreck 　还活着的战车有分离的碰撞模组，残骸的分离模组是简化过的。 - Q: “We’ve seen Yuri Pasholok’s post on the 88mm L/71 autoloader, will we see it in Jagdpanther and King Tiger?” A: “It won’t fit in KT” (SS: its implementation into Jagdpanther is thus not excluded) 　问：「长88的自动填弹机会出现在猎豹和虎王上吗？」答：「塞不进虎王里。」（SS: 没说不会装在猎豹上呦～） - tank hulls (both life tanks and wrecks) do not serve as a visibility obstacle (SS: a huge stone will block spotchecks, a tank won’t) – this rule however doesn’t apparently apply on the “object” wrecks, that are a part of the map (SS: for example the burning Malinovka Panther near northern base) – these do count as obstacles 　车体不会遮蔽视线判定，不管是活着还是残骸。但是在地图上做成战车残骸状的障碍物 件不适用这规则（SS: 例如 Malinovka 北方基地旁的豹式残骸） PS: WG EU really did it! Fail hattrick this Friday – if you open WoT launcher and click on the TRIPLE EXPERIENCE FOR THE FIRST VICTORY – you won’ t end on WoT page, you’ll end up on World of Warplanes portal. How terrible. 　PS: WG EU 真的这样搞了！如果打开 WoT launcher 点「首胜三倍经验」超连结，不会 到 WoT 页面，而会进入 WoWp 的入口网站——失败的耍人把戏；好贴萝卜… 原文：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/22/22-11-2013/ -- In church, they say to forgive! Forgiveness is between them and God; it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.160.166.14 ※ 编辑: WillieHuang 来自: 118.160.166.14 (11/23 03:19)