※ [本文轉錄自 historia 看板] 作者: MRZ (LQY) 看板: historia 標題: 軍事史之史觀理論010 時間: Wed Feb 23 13:16:22 2005 War and Warfare in Western Historiography The history-writing on war and warfare was dominated by its paradigmatic form: the narrative, up to the early 19th century. Ideals of literary aesthetics, in conjunction with political and socio-cultural ideologies, structured and shaped the narrative. Typical works, selected among those of high literary quality, were the war histories by Herodotos, Arrianos, Caesar, Sallust, and Livy; Froissart’s Chronique of the 14th century wars in France; and the memoirs of some 17th and 18th century military commanders. Historians attempting to analyse campaigns and battles objectively and in depth did exist—Thukydides, Xenophon, Polybius, for instance—but were rare phenomena. 三﹑西方史觀中的戰爭與戰爭形態 過去西方學者撰寫戰爭與戰爭形態﹐無非下列數種模式﹕19世紀初以前﹐通常是旁 白或自述。內容往往加入許多文藝書寫技巧﹑政治理念﹑社會文化思想﹑和個人主 張。重要典籍諸如希羅多德﹑阿里亞諾﹑凱撒﹑沙魯斯特﹑和李維的作品﹐都是文 學巨著﹔伏羅以撒的“年表”則是法國在14世紀的第一手戰史資料﹔還有17﹑18世 紀的軍事家們的回憶錄。當然也有企圖深入描寫戰役或會戰過程的史學家﹐如修昔 底德(正確發音應是‘觸衰得死’XD)﹑色諾芬﹑波利比武等等﹐但這些人都有如鳳 毛麟角。 -- 萬物皆非主，唯曼尼大神，至聖之先知，亞當史密斯。 La ilaha ill money，Adam Smith rasula'Llah 榮耀歸於曼尼。自宇宙之初成﹐貫古今與未來﹐直至永恆不滅。喀鏘！（收銀機響聲） Gloria patri Money. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in saecula saeculorum.Ka-ching! --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.30.77.184 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.250.145