作者aletheia (HERESY)
看板W-Philosophy
標題Re: The Analysis of Knowledge
時間Mon Nov 3 19:09:19 2003
※ 引述《popandy (pop)》之銘言:
: An Alternative Approach
: Above, we noted that the role of the justification condition is to
: ensure that the analysis does identify as knowledge a belief that is true
: out of luck. The lesson to be learned from the Gettier problem is that the
: justification condition by itself cannot ensure this. Even a justified
: belief, understood as a belief based on good evidence, can be true
: out of luck. Thus if the traditional analysis of knowledge is to exclude
: all cases in relation to luck, it must be amended with a suitable fourth
: condition, a condition that succeeds in the qualification of knowledge.
版主寫的嗎?
還不錯咧,你英文蠻在行的。
不過我對這段有點想法
「必定要追尋第四個條件」有點太武斷,這第四條件有時第五第六都出來了。
或許可作些修改?
像Alvin Goldman就是以別的方式來進行,詳見 A causal theory of knowing
試圖解答Gettier's problem
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.85.6.135
1F:→ read:我跟你打賭版主看過Goldman那篇文章:D 推 140.112.7.59 11/03
2F:→ aletheia:那很好阿 推 210.85.6.135 11/03