作者ahiru (地獄野鴨)
看板VISA
標題Re: [北美] 澄清申請H-1B十月不下來的爭議
時間Mon Aug 23 23:02:41 2010
首先感謝你找了這麼多資料
但是,你的解讀在我看來並不正確
因為根本沒有甚麼舊制跟新制
一切是應該照著C大找的這個資料跟CFR為準
當然,我也對我之前推文發生的錯誤致以最高的歉意~^_^|||
你會覺得有舊制跟新制是因為你一直執著於Q&A裡的一句話
"Once a timely filing has been made, the automatic cap-gap extension will
begin and will continue until the H-1B petition adjudication process has been
completed."
當你在問C大要怎麼解釋這句時
你根本性的忽略一個前提
這個制度是設計給大多數H-1B申請的學生
其OPT+grace period的時間都到不了10/1的情形
(其實通常狀況是,OPT結束時間跟H-1B的開始日都會有數月的差距)
所以C大找的規定、你找的這個答案跟你找的上個答案都一直圍繞著10/1(9/30)打轉
那是因為這個設計本來就是給H-1B批准在10/1號之前(雖然開始日是10/1)
但因為OPT已經過期而無法工作的F-1申請者
(也有人是連grace period都沒有到10/1故根本無法待在美國)
所以你上面回文的資料裡
在我舉出來的這句話後面他就分成H-1B准批及拒絕兩種情形
在已准批的狀況裡,他就直接講說申請者可以工作到9/30
那是因為這幾個問題都已經先預定10/1就是H-1B的開始日
(也就是H-1B一般會在10/1號前批准)
那如果H-1B的開始日不是10/1
那就應該是要等准批之後才能繼續工作才比較合理
(也就是10/1到許可日之間不能工作)
因為這本來就是H-1B的基本原則
對原本沒有工作許可的人,本來就是要等到H-1B批准後才能工作
為甚麼OPT就可以例外?那是因為我講的這種狀況的人太多
所以才會有Cap-Gap的制度,但例外並不是無窮止境的
您是這個版上熱心解答問題的版眾之一
且您的答案也常常會當成參考資料
如果你有這樣的認知
我是覺得你在解答問題時應該要更小心
如果因為你的一句話讓提問者誤判情勢的話
那請問他是要找誰負責?
共勉之~^^
※ 引述《hangsh (stoney)》之銘言:
: 主旨如題,對於有關爭議疑問的部份再作說明:
: 資料來源網站: USCIS官方網站
: http://tinyurl.com/5dd9ox
: What were the prior cap-gap regulations for F-1 students?
: The prior regulations addressed the cap-gap problem by authorizing an
: extension of an F-1 student’s authorized stay, but they did not extend the
: student’s employment authorization. This extension was not automatic; a
: notice had to be published in the Federal Register announcing the extension.
: Under the prior regulations, when this Federal Register notice was published,
: the student’s authorized stay was extended, but not the employment
: authorization. This meant the student could remain in the United States until
: October 1, when the approved H-1B employment began, but could not work until
: then.
: If a Federal Register notice authorizing an extension was not published,
: affected students would in many cases be required to leave the United States,
: apply for an H-1B visa, and seek readmission to the United States in H-1B
: status.
: How is the cap-gap situation changed under the interim final rule?
: F-1 academic students on post-completion OPT maintain valid F-1 status until
: the expiration of their OPT. Once that OPT has ended, they are authorized to
: remain in the United States for up to 60 days to prepare for departure.
: Under this rule, the F-1 status of students is automatically extended when
: the student is the beneficiary of an H-1B petition for the next fiscal year
: (with an October 1 employment start date) filed on his or her behalf during
: the period in which H-1B petitions are accepted for that fiscal year.
: The automatic extension terminates when USCIS rejects, denies, or revokes the
: H-1B petition.
: If the H-1B petition filed on behalf of the student is selected, the student
: may remain in the United States and, if on post-completion OPT, continue
: working until the October 1 start date indicated on the approved H-1B
: petition.
: The student may benefit from this provision only if he or she has not
: violated his or her status.
: 將舊制與修正後作個比較,答案就出來了
: 以上資料updated:04/10/2008
: 沒有必要去研判什麼保守不保守,抵觸法條等,你我都不是制定相關法規的人員
--
我是野鴨大叔~~(  ̄ c ̄)y▂ξ
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 67.87.233.104
1F:→ hangsh:首先謝謝您的指教! 08/24 01:09
2F:→ hangsh:問題的重點是原PO已申請H-1B(PENDING中)OPT已過期,假設9月 08/24 01:10
3F:→ hangsh:30日後,H-1B仍沒有審批結果,10月1日起是否可以工作? 08/24 01:11
4F:→ hangsh:我的認知是可以--根據USCIS,您認為不可以/根據CFR 08/24 01:11
5F:→ hangsh:至於正確答案,有待証實,不是你我各說各話。 08/24 01:12
6F:→ hangsh:最後奉勸法律人在沒有正確答案前沒資格說誤判情勢,要誰負責 08/24 07:12
7F:→ hangsh:等語,PTT只是供大家討論諮詢分享經驗的論壇~~ 08/24 07:16
8F:→ camouflage:回答問題還是慎重一點好 不然寧可讓當事人自己找答案 08/24 22:09