※ 引述《jerod (KG4MVP)》之銘言： : http://www.startribune.com/511/story/961068.html : Today is more than the midpoint of the Wolves' 82-game schedule. It also is : the one-year anniversary of the trade with Boston that transformed both teams : in appearance and style, if not necessarily in results. Since the deal, the : Wolves are 34-49. The Celtics, 28-53. 灰狼的今年球季已經走完一半了。 今天剛好是去年與波士頓交易的週年紀念日(XD) 在那個交易之後，灰狼的戰績為34勝49負，而特爾提克是28勝53負。 : Kevin McHale, Wolves vice president of basketball operations, has taken a : fair amount of grief from media and fans for his personnel moves, including : this one. But how does it look one year later? Let's break it down: 去年許多媒體與球迷對Kevin McHale(灰狼籃球執行副總裁) 所做的人事異動感到難過，這當然包括了那次交易。 但一年之後那次的交易看起來又如何呢?? 我們來看看: : Wally Szczerbiak's injury history is a factor; he has played 24 games and : half as many minutes this season as Davis. Chemistry between Szczerbiak and : Kevin Garnett also was an issue. Granted, Wally never would have pulled a : stunt like Davis did last Friday, walking off the floor in the third quarter. : But Szczerbiak's contract runs two full seasons after this one, worth another : $25 million. Davis' deal ends after he makes $6.8 million in 2007-08. Factor : in his ability to create, pass and, when focused, defend, and the Wolves look : OK here. : Edge: Wolves. Ricky Davis vs. Wally Szczerbiak Wally Szczerbiak的傷痛史是個不確定因素， 他本季打了24場球賽，上場時間是Davis的一半。 Szczerbiak與KG間的化學效應也是個問題。 可是Wally從不會做出Davis在上禮拜五的驚人舉動，在第三節逕自提早離場。 在那交易之後，Wally的合約還有整整兩年，2500萬美金。 Davis的合約則於2007-08到期，680萬美金。 無論在創造力，傳球，專注力，防守上來說， 這兩人交易的結果對灰狼來說是OK的。 得利:灰狼 : On the court, this is a blowout. Olowokandi was a bust, his only remaining : value based on a contract that would have come off Minnesota's books. But : then, the Wolves still would have needed a center and likely would have used : the salary freed up (and more) to find one. Would McHale have found one who : would be playing better right now than Blount? Unlikely. : Edge: Wolves. Mark Blount vs. Michael Olowokandi 禁區的大缺口。 Olowokandi是個廢，他的剩餘價值只在他的合約上。 但灰狼需要利用薪資空間來補一個中鋒。 McHale那時候找的到比現在的Blount打的更好的中鋒嗎? 應該沒這號人物。 得利:灰狼 : With Marcus Banks found wanting after a half-season as a solution at point : guard -- and signed away by Phoenix anyway -- we've lumped most of what's : left of the deal into this matchup. (Dwayne Jones for two second-round picks? : Yawn.) Obviously, head-to-head, the potential of the first-round pick wins. : But could the Wolves have gotten the deal done by only giving up Szczerbiak : and Olowokandi for Davis, Blount and Reed? Long shot. : Edge: Celtics. Justin Reed vs. future first-round pick(未來第一輪選秀權) 明顯的，第一輪選秀權的潛力看起來是贏了。 但灰狼僅靠Szczerbiak，Olowokandi就能換到Davis，Blount跟Reed? 那第一輪選秀權將選到誰? 這需要更多時間證明 得利:塞爾提克 (這段翻的很鳥....主要是因為我沒注意那時的交易...對不起誰能幫我補充 0.0 ) : The disparity in salaries swapped that day generated a $4.2 million trade : exception that, by NBA rules, expires today. The Wolves have had it available : for a year. But remember, a deal would turn pretend salary into real money. : And with Minnesota estimated to be at or over the luxury-tax threshold, any : player coming in would cost the club double -- his salary, plus an equal : amount in tax. It could be swapped for a draft pick. : Edge: Neither. $4.2 million trade exception 420萬現金轉移 當時薪資不對等的這項交易，造成了這420萬現金轉移的存在必須性。 但請記住，交易使你付錢，但也很可能為球隊生財。 明尼蘇達預測會超出薪資上限，所以任何加入的球員，對於灰狼來說， 其薪資都將因豪華稅成為兩倍。 得利: 差不多 : VERDICT : One might wonder about the "opportunity cost" of this deal -- could Wally and : Kandi have been swapped for something better? -- but it seems doubtful. Even : if you weigh Blount against the pick, would Minnesota draft a center ready to : average 13.1 points and 6.6 rebounds? A final way to judge it would be to : say, would the Wolves willingly reverse the deal today? Don't think so. : Edge: Wolves. 結論 有人可能對這個交易的"機會成本"有興趣，(註:機會成本是我亂翻的XD) -- Wally跟糖果人有可能變更好嗎? -- 但這令人懷疑。 即便你拿Blount來做比較， 你有可能馬上用第一輪選進一個平均13.1分6.6籃板的即戰力中鋒嗎? 最後一項利於論斷此交易的方式是， 今天灰狼願不願意把這個交易倒轉回來再交易一次呢? 大概不會吧!! 得利者: 灰狼 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 124.8.38.215