※ 引述《jerod (KG4MVP)》之铭言： : http://www.startribune.com/511/story/961068.html : Today is more than the midpoint of the Wolves' 82-game schedule. It also is : the one-year anniversary of the trade with Boston that transformed both teams : in appearance and style, if not necessarily in results. Since the deal, the : Wolves are 34-49. The Celtics, 28-53. 灰狼的今年球季已经走完一半了。 今天刚好是去年与波士顿交易的周年纪念日(XD) 在那个交易之後，灰狼的战绩为34胜49负，而特尔提克是28胜53负。 : Kevin McHale, Wolves vice president of basketball operations, has taken a : fair amount of grief from media and fans for his personnel moves, including : this one. But how does it look one year later? Let's break it down: 去年许多媒体与球迷对Kevin McHale(灰狼篮球执行副总裁) 所做的人事异动感到难过，这当然包括了那次交易。 但一年之後那次的交易看起来又如何呢?? 我们来看看: : Wally Szczerbiak's injury history is a factor; he has played 24 games and : half as many minutes this season as Davis. Chemistry between Szczerbiak and : Kevin Garnett also was an issue. Granted, Wally never would have pulled a : stunt like Davis did last Friday, walking off the floor in the third quarter. : But Szczerbiak's contract runs two full seasons after this one, worth another : $25 million. Davis' deal ends after he makes $6.8 million in 2007-08. Factor : in his ability to create, pass and, when focused, defend, and the Wolves look : OK here. : Edge: Wolves. Ricky Davis vs. Wally Szczerbiak Wally Szczerbiak的伤痛史是个不确定因素， 他本季打了24场球赛，上场时间是Davis的一半。 Szczerbiak与KG间的化学效应也是个问题。 可是Wally从不会做出Davis在上礼拜五的惊人举动，在第三节迳自提早离场。 在那交易之後，Wally的合约还有整整两年，2500万美金。 Davis的合约则於2007-08到期，680万美金。 无论在创造力，传球，专注力，防守上来说， 这两人交易的结果对灰狼来说是OK的。 得利:灰狼 : On the court, this is a blowout. Olowokandi was a bust, his only remaining : value based on a contract that would have come off Minnesota's books. But : then, the Wolves still would have needed a center and likely would have used : the salary freed up (and more) to find one. Would McHale have found one who : would be playing better right now than Blount? Unlikely. : Edge: Wolves. Mark Blount vs. Michael Olowokandi 禁区的大缺口。 Olowokandi是个废，他的剩余价值只在他的合约上。 但灰狼需要利用薪资空间来补一个中锋。 McHale那时候找的到比现在的Blount打的更好的中锋吗? 应该没这号人物。 得利:灰狼 : With Marcus Banks found wanting after a half-season as a solution at point : guard -- and signed away by Phoenix anyway -- we've lumped most of what's : left of the deal into this matchup. (Dwayne Jones for two second-round picks? : Yawn.) Obviously, head-to-head, the potential of the first-round pick wins. : But could the Wolves have gotten the deal done by only giving up Szczerbiak : and Olowokandi for Davis, Blount and Reed? Long shot. : Edge: Celtics. Justin Reed vs. future first-round pick(未来第一轮选秀权) 明显的，第一轮选秀权的潜力看起来是赢了。 但灰狼仅靠Szczerbiak，Olowokandi就能换到Davis，Blount跟Reed? 那第一轮选秀权将选到谁? 这需要更多时间证明 得利:塞尔提克 (这段翻的很鸟....主要是因为我没注意那时的交易...对不起谁能帮我补充 0.0 ) : The disparity in salaries swapped that day generated a $4.2 million trade : exception that, by NBA rules, expires today. The Wolves have had it available : for a year. But remember, a deal would turn pretend salary into real money. : And with Minnesota estimated to be at or over the luxury-tax threshold, any : player coming in would cost the club double -- his salary, plus an equal : amount in tax. It could be swapped for a draft pick. : Edge: Neither. $4.2 million trade exception 420万现金转移 当时薪资不对等的这项交易，造成了这420万现金转移的存在必须性。 但请记住，交易使你付钱，但也很可能为球队生财。 明尼苏达预测会超出薪资上限，所以任何加入的球员，对於灰狼来说， 其薪资都将因豪华税成为两倍。 得利: 差不多 : VERDICT : One might wonder about the "opportunity cost" of this deal -- could Wally and : Kandi have been swapped for something better? -- but it seems doubtful. Even : if you weigh Blount against the pick, would Minnesota draft a center ready to : average 13.1 points and 6.6 rebounds? A final way to judge it would be to : say, would the Wolves willingly reverse the deal today? Don't think so. : Edge: Wolves. 结论 有人可能对这个交易的"机会成本"有兴趣，(注:机会成本是我乱翻的XD) -- Wally跟糖果人有可能变更好吗? -- 但这令人怀疑。 即便你拿Blount来做比较， 你有可能马上用第一轮选进一个平均13.1分6.6篮板的即战力中锋吗? 最後一项利於论断此交易的方式是， 今天灰狼愿不愿意把这个交易倒转回来再交易一次呢? 大概不会吧!! 得利者: 灰狼 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 124.8.38.215