作者bolam (95 10 23步排入伍)
看板RS
標題Re: 維尼熊的話
時間Sun Jul 24 10:17:38 2016
http://rockingsoccer.com/zh-tw/football/forum/home-en/1?topic=68963&posts=118
Scout/transfer market updates - looking for feedback
There are a few things we consider changing about the transfer market.
維尼熊計劃對轉會市場實施變革。
We would want to make the scout regions a little more important again.
球探搜索區域(scout regions)這件事情的重要性會再次提高。
We would increase the amount of scout regions to 14 and rebalance them. At
scout level 1 you would get your own region and two random regions that you
can not change. At level 10 you would have a total of 12 regions, so no one
would be able to see everything any more.
區域會重新劃分，並且增加到14個(目前10個)。
級別1球探辦公室，可以搜索本國區域以及兩個無法更改的隨機指派區域。
換句話說，級別10球探辦公室，可以搜索總共12個區域，不再有人能全都看。
We would also like to make it impossible to bid on players that are not from
one of the scout regions you selected in your scout office. We realise this
could be controversial, that's why we're putting it here first before
deciding on it.
維尼熊計劃，未來只能出價搜索區域內的球員。
這個想法勢必引起正反兩方大量討論，所以先討論，而非直接上線執行。
It's a change that I've considered necessary for a long time already though.
It would reduce the advantage a small club can get from having a friend (or a
multi that we haven't caught yet) with a big scout office who will search for
players for them. Two medium clubs can also get an advantage by each
selecting half of the regions. This is probably the most abusable part of the
game and I see no other way to solve this.
維尼熊認為，分享球探的現象必須改革，有些玩家甚至違規多開帳號(官方還未抓到)
，以搜索更多區域。
遊戲有兩個被濫用的規則死角，是時機改革並降低好處。
1. 大球會在轉會市場罩小球會(協助搜索球員)
2. 兩個中型球會對半切轉會市場，並交換資訊，
The transfer forum would be removed. These types of posts do not really have
a place on the forum anyway, it's just something we allowed to make it clear
these links can't be posted anywhere else on the forum, but it shouldn't be
necessary.
未來無法以任何型式在論壇打廣告，
論壇不再提供廣告專區，也不允許po待售球員網址。
Finally there should be a small change to the bidding mechanism: A new round
of bidding would only start when there are at least 5 bidding teams AND at
least one of them bid the maximum amount. This would solve the problem that
when 5 teams bid the asking price of an expensive player no one else can bid
without bidding significantly more than any of those 5 teams. This can be a
problem for expensive players.
最終，目前轉會市場的高價球員轉會機制有一個困境 :
球員一旦高價掛牌，並且有五個僅出掛牌價(左右)的站衛兵報價，下一份報價，
必須出明顯高過這五份報價很多的金額。
(因為此時再出就推到下一輪，這是轉會市場機制問題)
因此，轉會市場的出價機制可能會微調，必須同時滿足兩個條件才能推下一輪
1 .至少五個球隊報價。
2. 至少一隊報價最高價。
edit:
I forgot to mention here that we're also looking for some ways to modify the
winning percentages for transfers. We could add one or maybe two categories
of yes or no's and make the final weight exponential instead of linear (each
next "yes" would be worth more than the previous).
補充 :
維尼熊計劃改變轉會的獲勝機率。
1. 可能會增加1-2個轉會屬性，增加Yes和No的數量
2. Yes和No的影響，可能從"線性"更改為"指數"。換句話說，比起現行機制，
每個Yes會增加更高勝率。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.34.189.49
※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/RS/M.1469326660.A.E11.html
※ 編輯: bolam (1.34.189.49), 07/24/2016 10:45:34
1F：推 mksykcntdnrr: 我在想這系列以後要不要在標題註明一下是談什麼， 07/24 10:28
2F：→ mksykcntdnrr: 方便未來要找的時候搜尋，不過缺點是這樣在外面就 07/24 10:28
3F：→ mksykcntdnrr: 沒辦法用大寫S找整系列 07/24 10:28
4F：→ asdf95: 狗熊的萬惡改革 07/24 10:40
5F：推 usambit: 感謝跛輪！推一下 07/24 15:33
6F：推 nft: 這個變動很大啊...(雖然我從來沒借過球探...orz) 07/24 22:50