作者bolam (95 10 23步排入伍)
看板RS
标题Re: 维尼熊的话
时间Sun Jul 24 10:17:38 2016
http://rockingsoccer.com/zh-tw/football/forum/home-en/1?topic=68963&posts=118
Scout/transfer market updates - looking for feedback
There are a few things we consider changing about the transfer market.
维尼熊计划对转会市场实施变革。
We would want to make the scout regions a little more important again.
球探搜索区域(scout regions)这件事情的重要性会再次提高。
We would increase the amount of scout regions to 14 and rebalance them. At
scout level 1 you would get your own region and two random regions that you
can not change. At level 10 you would have a total of 12 regions, so no one
would be able to see everything any more.
区域会重新划分，并且增加到14个(目前10个)。
级别1球探办公室，可以搜索本国区域以及两个无法更改的随机指派区域。
换句话说，级别10球探办公室，可以搜索总共12个区域，不再有人能全都看。
We would also like to make it impossible to bid on players that are not from
one of the scout regions you selected in your scout office. We realise this
could be controversial, that's why we're putting it here first before
deciding on it.
维尼熊计划，未来只能出价搜索区域内的球员。
这个想法势必引起正反两方大量讨论，所以先讨论，而非直接上线执行。
It's a change that I've considered necessary for a long time already though.
It would reduce the advantage a small club can get from having a friend (or a
multi that we haven't caught yet) with a big scout office who will search for
players for them. Two medium clubs can also get an advantage by each
selecting half of the regions. This is probably the most abusable part of the
game and I see no other way to solve this.
维尼熊认为，分享球探的现象必须改革，有些玩家甚至违规多开帐号(官方还未抓到)
，以搜索更多区域。
游戏有两个被滥用的规则死角，是时机改革并降低好处。
1. 大球会在转会市场罩小球会(协助搜索球员)
2. 两个中型球会对半切转会市场，并交换资讯，
The transfer forum would be removed. These types of posts do not really have
a place on the forum anyway, it's just something we allowed to make it clear
these links can't be posted anywhere else on the forum, but it shouldn't be
necessary.
未来无法以任何型式在论坛打广告，
论坛不再提供广告专区，也不允许po待售球员网址。
Finally there should be a small change to the bidding mechanism: A new round
of bidding would only start when there are at least 5 bidding teams AND at
least one of them bid the maximum amount. This would solve the problem that
when 5 teams bid the asking price of an expensive player no one else can bid
without bidding significantly more than any of those 5 teams. This can be a
problem for expensive players.
最终，目前转会市场的高价球员转会机制有一个困境 :
球员一旦高价挂牌，并且有五个仅出挂牌价(左右)的站卫兵报价，下一份报价，
必须出明显高过这五份报价很多的金额。
(因为此时再出就推到下一轮，这是转会市场机制问题)
因此，转会市场的出价机制可能会微调，必须同时满足两个条件才能推下一轮
1 .至少五个球队报价。
2. 至少一队报价最高价。
edit:
I forgot to mention here that we're also looking for some ways to modify the
winning percentages for transfers. We could add one or maybe two categories
of yes or no's and make the final weight exponential instead of linear (each
next "yes" would be worth more than the previous).
补充 :
维尼熊计划改变转会的获胜机率。
1. 可能会增加1-2个转会属性，增加Yes和No的数量
2. Yes和No的影响，可能从"线性"更改为"指数"。换句话说，比起现行机制，
每个Yes会增加更高胜率。
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 1.34.189.49
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/RS/M.1469326660.A.E11.html
※ 编辑: bolam (1.34.189.49), 07/24/2016 10:45:34
1F：推 mksykcntdnrr: 我在想这系列以後要不要在标题注明一下是谈什麽， 07/24 10:28
2F：→ mksykcntdnrr: 方便未来要找的时候搜寻，不过缺点是这样在外面就 07/24 10:28
3F：→ mksykcntdnrr: 没办法用大写S找整系列 07/24 10:28
4F：→ asdf95: 狗熊的万恶改革 07/24 10:40
5F：推 usambit: 感谢跛轮！推一下 07/24 15:33
6F：推 nft: 这个变动很大啊...(虽然我从来没借过球探...orz) 07/24 22:50