Michael Helland wrote: > On May 1, 5:24 pm, Sam Wormley <[email protected]> wrote: >> See:http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/Relativity/SR/experi... >> Sections 4 and on... > > > Basically that says that space and time as they are studied in science > are relative. > > Again, I point you to Newton's definition, which says that what we > observe is relative space: > > "Relative space is some movable dimension or measure of the absolute > spaces; which our senses determine by its position to bodies;" > > If, by definition, all observations of space are relative space, the > only way to prove Newton's definition wrong is to observe absolute > space. > > Which your cite says is impossible. > > Newton's definition of relative time and Einstein's definition of time > are identical. You are pretty confused. What level of mathematics can you handle?