作者chingi (Are you brainwashed?)
看板PhD
標題Re: 全國研究生助學金 陳情書 (一封公開信)
時間Sat Dec 24 21:34:08 2005
As a taxpayer, I don't know see any reason to subsidize graduate
students. The government does not force them to enter a graduate
school. They do not provice any serive to taxpayers, either.
Why do taxpayer need to pay for their living? Furthermore,
these people are likely to earn more in the future. It is unfair
for poeple with less education to subsidize people with more
education.
If these graduate students can contribute to the research of
their professors, the professors should pay for the assistance.
If they can contribute to the teaching in their department,
the department should pay.
If students only study or research for their own future life,
why do taxpayers need to give them stipend?
If taxpayer really want to improve the quality of research in
universities, they shuold give more money to researchers.
(How to allocate money to researchers is another issue.)
Students should receive money only if they contribute to the
researchers.
(Or they can apply for research grants by themselves.)
Of course, if I am a 既得利益者, I don't want my benefits to be
taken away. So, in my view, the GSA is simply an interest group
to lobby for its members.
--
PTT 有個討論芝加哥的版 ---
生活娛樂館 生活, 娛樂, 心情
GlobalView 國際 Σ世界地球村 → 美國/異國旅遊
Chicago 都市 ●芝加哥 Chicagoland
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 199.74.99.98
1F：推 losfer:People like you make this place weak. 12/24 23:40
2F：推 devilstick:話不能這麼說，那私立大學都要來抗議國立大學學費便宜 12/25 00:55
3F：推 devilstick:這應該不僅僅是既得利益者的私心吧 @@ 12/25 01:08
4F：推 chingi:真要鼓勵碩士班學生做研究的話, 應該把錢拿來發論文獎學金 12/25 03:39
5F：推 chingi:齊頭式平等的助學金, 只能增加碩士班報考率, 無助於研究 12/25 03:44
6F：推 lerudit:Agree! 12/25 14:39
7F：推 dsyang:支持chingi的論述！ 雖然已經當過既得利益者了．．． 12/25 16:43
8F：推 perceval:推 不過chingi現在好像不是Taxpayer 12/25 21:54
9F：推 dsyang:所以說 chingi 現在與兩方無大關係，單純就事論事啦 12/28 04:46
10F：推 economist:Everybody loves ds. 04/27 13:45