作者chingi (Are you brainwashed?)
看板PhD
标题Re: 全国研究生助学金 陈情书 (一封公开信)
时间Sat Dec 24 21:34:08 2005
As a taxpayer, I don't know see any reason to subsidize graduate
students. The government does not force them to enter a graduate
school. They do not provice any serive to taxpayers, either.
Why do taxpayer need to pay for their living? Furthermore,
these people are likely to earn more in the future. It is unfair
for poeple with less education to subsidize people with more
education.
If these graduate students can contribute to the research of
their professors, the professors should pay for the assistance.
If they can contribute to the teaching in their department,
the department should pay.
If students only study or research for their own future life,
why do taxpayers need to give them stipend?
If taxpayer really want to improve the quality of research in
universities, they shuold give more money to researchers.
(How to allocate money to researchers is another issue.)
Students should receive money only if they contribute to the
researchers.
(Or they can apply for research grants by themselves.)
Of course, if I am a 既得利益者, I don't want my benefits to be
taken away. So, in my view, the GSA is simply an interest group
to lobby for its members.
--
PTT 有个讨论芝加哥的版 ---
生活娱乐馆 生活, 娱乐, 心情
GlobalView 国际 Σ世界地球村 → 美国/异国旅游
Chicago 都市 ●芝加哥 Chicagoland
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 199.74.99.98
1F：推 losfer:People like you make this place weak. 12/24 23:40
2F：推 devilstick:话不能这麽说，那私立大学都要来抗议国立大学学费便宜 12/25 00:55
3F：推 devilstick:这应该不仅仅是既得利益者的私心吧 @@ 12/25 01:08
4F：推 chingi:真要鼓励硕士班学生做研究的话, 应该把钱拿来发论文奖学金 12/25 03:39
5F：推 chingi:齐头式平等的助学金, 只能增加硕士班报考率, 无助於研究 12/25 03:44
6F：推 lerudit:Agree! 12/25 14:39
7F：推 dsyang:支持chingi的论述！ 虽然已经当过既得利益者了．．． 12/25 16:43
8F：推 perceval:推 不过chingi现在好像不是Taxpayer 12/25 21:54
9F：推 dsyang:所以说 chingi 现在与两方无大关系，单纯就事论事啦 12/28 04:46
10F：推 economist:Everybody loves ds. 04/27 13:45