http://www.zdnet.com.tw/enterprise/topic/wireless/0,2000085732,20140447,00.htm 又一家P2P網站敗訴 這回是Mininova ZDNET新聞專區：Richard Koman 2009/08/27 12:29:02 北歐法院看來持續掃蕩P2P 檔案交換網站（torrent sites），繼 日前瑞典法院下令ISP（網際網路供應商）必須切斷The Pirate Bay 連線後，PC Mag報導一家荷蘭法院下令Mininova.org必須在30天內清除 站上所有連結至版權檔案的tracker。 Mininova本案敗訴的關鍵在於有證據顯示，站方十分積極清理/過 濾站上偽裝是電影或電視節目檔案的惡意軟體。法院因此認為，Mini nova應該有能力來過濾掉有著作權的內容，只是站方不願如此做而已 。 「法院判定Mininova既有能力清除連結至惡意檔案的torrent檔， 這顯示他們有能力來過濾內容。另外，法院也依照原告提出的一份報 告認定，該站有80-90%的torrents都是連結至享有著作權的資料，再 加上該站的分類還包括電影、電視節目與迪士尼等字眼，侵權行為明 確。」 Mininova表示會上訴，但看來情況並不樂觀。 「我們並不滿意這次的判決，」Mininova共同創辦人Eric Dubbelb oer在聲明中表示。「這次判決顯示Mininova必須重新評估我們的營 運模式，我們會先仔細看過判決書才決定，我們也會考慮上訴。」 -- Mininova 官網的聲明 http://tinyurl.com/l6pvl3 Utrecht, August 26th 2009 – Today the Dutch Court of Utrecht ruled that BitTorrent platform Mininova acts unlawful. Mininova considers to appeal this judgment. The court did not agree with Brein on all demands. Specifically, it ruled that Mininova does not infringe copyright and neighboring rights. The court also found Mininova can not be expected to remove files that are “reasonably likely” refer to infringing material. Remarkably, the verdict does not give any consideration to the fact that Mininova has developed a content filter for Brein, nor to the cooperation between Mininova and other organizations of rights holders. This surprises Mininova, because it has always stressed the importance of cooperation. Erik Dubbelboer, co-founder of Mininova: “We are obviously not satisfied with this ruling. The result of this ruling for Mininova is that we have to reevaluate our business operations. At this time, we cannot determine what this will actually entail or imply. We will have to examine the verdict thoroughly first. We are considering to appeal this judgment.” -- --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.81.204.98