作者wanted (...)
看板NCCU98_FM
標題[新聞] Citigroup Considers Sale of Company, WSJ Says
時間Fri Nov 21 13:06:52 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ayIrmf7gHARs&refer=home
Citigroup Considers Sale of Company, Wall Street Journal Says
By Jesse Westbrook
Nov. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc., which fell 26 percent in New York
trading today, is considering selling off pieces of the bank or the whole
company, the Wall Street Journal reported online, citing people familiar with
the matter.
Talks are preliminary and don’t suggest that New York-based Citigroup is
backing away from its insistence that it has sufficient capital and funding,
the Journal said.
Buffeted by four straight quarterly losses, Citigroup has raised about $75
billion since December by selling assets and equity stakes, including a $25
billion injection from the U.S. Treasury. The government will do whatever it
takes to stabilize Citigroup, including pouring more money into the company,
because of the threat its failure would pose to the global economy, said
Peter Wallison, a fellow at the Washington-based American Enterprise
Institute.
“There is no question that Citigroup will not be allowed to fail,” said
Wallison, who was Treasury Department general counsel under former President
Ronald Reagan. “I would not think it is a good idea to restore the ban on
short selling,” he said.
Citigroup declined $1.69 to a 15-year low of $4.71 on the New York Stock
Exchange at 4:15 p.m. It has fallen 84 percent this year.
Citigroup has lost about $20 billion in the past four quarters as bad loans
increased and demand for banking services declined. Chief Executive Officer
Vikram Pandit said this week the company will cut 52,000 jobs in the next
year to lower costs.
Citigroup is seeking to revive a prohibition on short- selling financial
stocks, according to a person familiar with the matter. The bank has
discussed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and lawmakers its
proposal to reinstitute the ban on bets that stock prices will fall, said the
person, who declined to be identified because the discussions weren’t
public.
---
年初的時候
CITI跌到25美元時
還建議公司買進呢
因為CITI至少在過去20多年來
沒有跌破20美元的紀錄
沒想到
現在只剩4塊多美元而已
過去一個月暴跌70%
金融市場的黑天鵝事件
真的沒有什麼不可能...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.245.108.191
1F:推 Mahdi:買個股還是要看大盤 我相信貴公司也不奉行價值投資 11/22 02:25
2F:→ Mahdi:我甚至懷疑 台灣業界有真的奉行價值投資的法人..... 11/22 02:26
3F:推 Mahdi:盯短期績效、追逐消息面的倒是滿街都是..... 11/22 02:31
4F:推 Mahdi:在買"史瓦格期貨技術分析"當天 翻了"史瓦格期貨基本分析" 11/22 02:34
5F:→ Mahdi:對基本分析盲點的陳述實在太棒了 有興趣的朋友可以去翻閱 11/22 02:35
6F:→ Mahdi:讓我更堅信技術分析絕對是散戶好的朋友 11/22 02:36
7F:推 Mahdi:並不是抹滅"基本分析"的價值 11/22 02:41
8F:→ Mahdi:(Livermore、黃毅雄也都強調基本分析對持倉信心的重要性) 11/22 02:42
9F:→ Mahdi:而是"誤用"基本分析,將造成恐怖的災難 11/22 02:43
10F:→ Mahdi:因為越跌越要買(是否當初立論有務,且停損點在哪?) 11/22 02:44
11F:→ Mahdi:詳情請見"史瓦格期貨基本分析"書中的"十四種邏輯謬誤" 推! 11/22 02:45
12F:→ wanted:嗯,當初也只是試單而已,只小小買了一支美金部位 11/22 07:05
13F:→ wanted:停損設20%,後來就砍掉了 11/22 07:05
14F:→ wanted:就壽險業而言,還是有部分是吃價值分析這一套的 11/22 07:10
15F:→ wanted:畢竟是對自己負責績效 不對外面的散戶投資人 11/22 07:11
16F:→ wanted:不過在當時那種狀況,也沒人敢用力賭下去 11/22 07:11
17F:→ wanted:所以用很小的部位來試誤法一下 是主要的邏輯囉 11/22 07:12
18F:→ wanted:一跌下去就知道自己錯啦 也不會再加碼 哈 11/22 07:15
19F:→ wanted:阿狗兄推薦的這本書,我有上集,不過沒有讀完.. 11/22 07:23
20F:→ wanted:感謝分享阿 我要回頭去認真唸一下 :) 11/22 07:23
21F:→ wanted:應該說 部位龐大的法人真正要在市場獲利賺錢 11/22 07:24
22F:→ wanted:用的法則可能不能只是散戶那一套 11/22 07:25
23F:→ wanted:因為進出一千億跟幾百萬幾千萬 策略完全不同 11/22 07:31
24F:→ wanted:不過散戶的交易策略跟大戶法人是完全不同的 這小弟深表認同 11/22 07:32
25F:→ wanted:因為進出金額小、不會影響市場 所以等表態再進場是最好的 11/22 07:33
26F:→ wanted:沒有本錢跟法人一樣去測市場低點 11/22 07:33
※ 編輯: wanted 來自: 203.73.233.169 (11/22 07:42)