作者wanted (...)
看板NCCU98_FM
标题[新闻] Citigroup Considers Sale of Company, WSJ Says
时间Fri Nov 21 13:06:52 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ayIrmf7gHARs&refer=home
Citigroup Considers Sale of Company, Wall Street Journal Says
By Jesse Westbrook
Nov. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc., which fell 26 percent in New York
trading today, is considering selling off pieces of the bank or the whole
company, the Wall Street Journal reported online, citing people familiar with
the matter.
Talks are preliminary and don’t suggest that New York-based Citigroup is
backing away from its insistence that it has sufficient capital and funding,
the Journal said.
Buffeted by four straight quarterly losses, Citigroup has raised about $75
billion since December by selling assets and equity stakes, including a $25
billion injection from the U.S. Treasury. The government will do whatever it
takes to stabilize Citigroup, including pouring more money into the company,
because of the threat its failure would pose to the global economy, said
Peter Wallison, a fellow at the Washington-based American Enterprise
Institute.
“There is no question that Citigroup will not be allowed to fail,” said
Wallison, who was Treasury Department general counsel under former President
Ronald Reagan. “I would not think it is a good idea to restore the ban on
short selling,” he said.
Citigroup declined $1.69 to a 15-year low of $4.71 on the New York Stock
Exchange at 4:15 p.m. It has fallen 84 percent this year.
Citigroup has lost about $20 billion in the past four quarters as bad loans
increased and demand for banking services declined. Chief Executive Officer
Vikram Pandit said this week the company will cut 52,000 jobs in the next
year to lower costs.
Citigroup is seeking to revive a prohibition on short- selling financial
stocks, according to a person familiar with the matter. The bank has
discussed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and lawmakers its
proposal to reinstitute the ban on bets that stock prices will fall, said the
person, who declined to be identified because the discussions weren’t
public.
---
年初的时候
CITI跌到25美元时
还建议公司买进呢
因为CITI至少在过去20多年来
没有跌破20美元的纪录
没想到
现在只剩4块多美元而已
过去一个月暴跌70%
金融市场的黑天鹅事件
真的没有什麽不可能...
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.245.108.191
1F:推 Mahdi:买个股还是要看大盘 我相信贵公司也不奉行价值投资 11/22 02:25
2F:→ Mahdi:我甚至怀疑 台湾业界有真的奉行价值投资的法人..... 11/22 02:26
3F:推 Mahdi:盯短期绩效、追逐消息面的倒是满街都是..... 11/22 02:31
4F:推 Mahdi:在买"史瓦格期货技术分析"当天 翻了"史瓦格期货基本分析" 11/22 02:34
5F:→ Mahdi:对基本分析盲点的陈述实在太棒了 有兴趣的朋友可以去翻阅 11/22 02:35
6F:→ Mahdi:让我更坚信技术分析绝对是散户好的朋友 11/22 02:36
7F:推 Mahdi:并不是抹灭"基本分析"的价值 11/22 02:41
8F:→ Mahdi:(Livermore、黄毅雄也都强调基本分析对持仓信心的重要性) 11/22 02:42
9F:→ Mahdi:而是"误用"基本分析,将造成恐怖的灾难 11/22 02:43
10F:→ Mahdi:因为越跌越要买(是否当初立论有务,且停损点在哪?) 11/22 02:44
11F:→ Mahdi:详情请见"史瓦格期货基本分析"书中的"十四种逻辑谬误" 推! 11/22 02:45
12F:→ wanted:嗯,当初也只是试单而已,只小小买了一支美金部位 11/22 07:05
13F:→ wanted:停损设20%,後来就砍掉了 11/22 07:05
14F:→ wanted:就寿险业而言,还是有部分是吃价值分析这一套的 11/22 07:10
15F:→ wanted:毕竟是对自己负责绩效 不对外面的散户投资人 11/22 07:11
16F:→ wanted:不过在当时那种状况,也没人敢用力赌下去 11/22 07:11
17F:→ wanted:所以用很小的部位来试误法一下 是主要的逻辑罗 11/22 07:12
18F:→ wanted:一跌下去就知道自己错啦 也不会再加码 哈 11/22 07:15
19F:→ wanted:阿狗兄推荐的这本书,我有上集,不过没有读完.. 11/22 07:23
20F:→ wanted:感谢分享阿 我要回头去认真念一下 :) 11/22 07:23
21F:→ wanted:应该说 部位庞大的法人真正要在市场获利赚钱 11/22 07:24
22F:→ wanted:用的法则可能不能只是散户那一套 11/22 07:25
23F:→ wanted:因为进出一千亿跟几百万几千万 策略完全不同 11/22 07:31
24F:→ wanted:不过散户的交易策略跟大户法人是完全不同的 这小弟深表认同 11/22 07:32
25F:→ wanted:因为进出金额小、不会影响市场 所以等表态再进场是最好的 11/22 07:33
26F:→ wanted:没有本钱跟法人一样去测市场低点 11/22 07:33
※ 编辑: wanted 来自: 203.73.233.169 (11/22 07:42)