作者coach (LUCIFER)
看板NCAA
標題68強如何排名和怎麼選37支AT-LARGE
時間Tue Mar 15 18:10:31 2011
我看了英文的維基 上面這麼寫
The NCAA has established Selection Committees for both the men's and women's
tournaments. Teams that did not win their conference tournament may be eligible
to earn an at-large berth. At-large berths are determined by record, ranking,
strength of schedule, and many other factors. A key factor in determining
at-large berths is the Ratings Percentage Index, popularly referred to as the
RPI. One absolute rule is that a team with a losing record after the conference
tournament (or regular season in the case of the Ivy League) is barred from
consideration for an at-large berth.
他是根據戰績 排名 賽程強度 RPI值
RPI值:
RPI = (WP * 0.25) + (OWP * 0.50) + (OOWP * 0.25)
where WP is Winning Percentage,
OWP is Opponents' Winning Percentage and
OOWP is Opponents' Opponents' Winning Percentage.
The WP is calculated by taking a team's wins divided by the number of games
it has played (i.e. wins plus losses).
還真的很複雜 好像還包括主勝 客勝 中立場勝等因素
不曉得有沒有包含聯盟實力因素?
排名是如何排?
這邊指的排 是不是將68隊依種子序分成16個檔次[pot] 每個檔次四隊
然後抽籤排入進四個分區?
[當然要打first four的另外排]
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.136.208.166
1F：推 hunight:RPI簡單這樣想 他的原意是鼓勵去挑戰更強的對手 03/15 18:13
2F：→ hunight:戰勝弱隊幫助不大 輸給強隊也敗的不多 想太複雜很辛苦的 03/15 18:13
3F：→ hunight:還有今年的37隊.....嗯 just business和政治鬥爭 03/15 18:14
4F：→ hunight:看的太認真會氣的燒起來 03/15 18:15
5F：推 mrkey:基本上at large該進的都會進 會吵那些本來該進卻沒進的... 03/15 23:59
6F：→ mrkey:那都是馬後砲. Commissioner 有提到, 唯一重點是盡量不要 03/16 00:00
7F：→ mrkey:在前兩輪出現同分區對手對戰的可能性 03/16 00:00
8F：推 mrkey:但今年的11,12,13,14,15會非常有趣 可能會很多dog barking 03/16 00:25