作者coach (LUCIFER)
看板NCAA
标题68强如何排名和怎麽选37支AT-LARGE
时间Tue Mar 15 18:10:31 2011
我看了英文的维基 上面这麽写
The NCAA has established Selection Committees for both the men's and women's
tournaments. Teams that did not win their conference tournament may be eligible
to earn an at-large berth. At-large berths are determined by record, ranking,
strength of schedule, and many other factors. A key factor in determining
at-large berths is the Ratings Percentage Index, popularly referred to as the
RPI. One absolute rule is that a team with a losing record after the conference
tournament (or regular season in the case of the Ivy League) is barred from
consideration for an at-large berth.
他是根据战绩 排名 赛程强度 RPI值
RPI值:
RPI = (WP * 0.25) + (OWP * 0.50) + (OOWP * 0.25)
where WP is Winning Percentage,
OWP is Opponents' Winning Percentage and
OOWP is Opponents' Opponents' Winning Percentage.
The WP is calculated by taking a team's wins divided by the number of games
it has played (i.e. wins plus losses).
还真的很复杂 好像还包括主胜 客胜 中立场胜等因素
不晓得有没有包含联盟实力因素?
排名是如何排?
这边指的排 是不是将68队依种子序分成16个档次[pot] 每个档次四队
然後抽签排入进四个分区?
[当然要打first four的另外排]
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.136.208.166
1F：推 hunight:RPI简单这样想 他的原意是鼓励去挑战更强的对手 03/15 18:13
2F：→ hunight:战胜弱队帮助不大 输给强队也败的不多 想太复杂很辛苦的 03/15 18:13
3F：→ hunight:还有今年的37队.....嗯 just business和政治斗争 03/15 18:14
4F：→ hunight:看的太认真会气的烧起来 03/15 18:15
5F：推 mrkey:基本上at large该进的都会进 会吵那些本来该进却没进的... 03/15 23:59
6F：→ mrkey:那都是马後炮. Commissioner 有提到, 唯一重点是尽量不要 03/16 00:00
7F：→ mrkey:在前两轮出现同分区对手对战的可能性 03/16 00:00
8F：推 mrkey:但今年的11,12,13,14,15会非常有趣 可能会很多dog barking 03/16 00:25