作者karmapayes (種子)
看板Military
標題[提問] M60A3 和 M48H 的射控比較
時間Sun Jun 8 01:00:35 2014
如題
M60A3是M1即將服役時為了補充換裝備時的墊檔
有M1等級的射控
穩定器，橫風測定儀，雷射測距儀，夜間熱影像，和最重要的彈道電腦計算機
可以機器解析敵我相對速度預測敵方未來位置配合彈道落點
我查到這篇外國網站甚至說開過M1A1的都說M60A3的熱影像更讚!!
The Tank Thermal Sight was a significant advance and tankers who have
operated A3’s and M1A1’s almost universally stated that the TTS on the
M-60A3 was the best thermal imager ever fielded. It was not used on the M1
series due to its cost and large size.
http://www.patton-mania.com/M60_Patton/m60_patton.html (原文)
M48H則是台灣拿M1射控用M60車體+M48A2砲塔+M68A1(這樣好像跟M60沒甚麼差?)
的成果
因為砲等級一樣，如果純比射控(好啦~雙方都經不起對方灌一砲對吧^^)
都幾?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.253.72.51
※ 文章網址: http://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/Military/M.1402160440.A.FBC.html
1F：推 PAULDAVID :印像中48h射控零件比60tts更強;但因為自行整合可靠度 06/08 13:56
2F：→ PAULDAVID :稍差(不嚴重),詳情有請專人指正 06/08 14:09
3F：推 scrage :CM11數位化程度較高按按鈕搞定，M60A3射控是類比式 06/08 17:38
4F：→ scrage :的，聽說還有旋鈕， by11射手 06/08 17:38
5F：推 wachins :M60A3的旋鈕正確說是"拉轉" 06/08 23:40