作者karmapayes (种子)
看板Military
标题[提问] M60A3 和 M48H 的射控比较
时间Sun Jun 8 01:00:35 2014
如题
M60A3是M1即将服役时为了补充换装备时的垫档
有M1等级的射控
稳定器，横风测定仪，雷射测距仪，夜间热影像，和最重要的弹道电脑计算机
可以机器解析敌我相对速度预测敌方未来位置配合弹道落点
我查到这篇外国网站甚至说开过M1A1的都说M60A3的热影像更赞!!
The Tank Thermal Sight was a significant advance and tankers who have
operated A3’s and M1A1’s almost universally stated that the TTS on the
M-60A3 was the best thermal imager ever fielded. It was not used on the M1
series due to its cost and large size.
http://www.patton-mania.com/M60_Patton/m60_patton.html (原文)
M48H则是台湾拿M1射控用M60车体+M48A2炮塔+M68A1(这样好像跟M60没甚麽差?)
的成果
因为炮等级一样，如果纯比射控(好啦~双方都经不起对方灌一炮对吧^^)
都几?
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 111.253.72.51
※ 文章网址: http://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Military/M.1402160440.A.FBC.html
1F：推 PAULDAVID :印像中48h射控零件比60tts更强;但因为自行整合可靠度 06/08 13:56
2F：→ PAULDAVID :稍差(不严重),详情有请专人指正 06/08 14:09
3F：推 scrage :CM11数位化程度较高按按钮搞定，M60A3射控是类比式 06/08 17:38
4F：→ scrage :的，听说还有旋钮， by11射手 06/08 17:38
5F：推 wachins :M60A3的旋钮正确说是"拉转" 06/08 23:40