作者Jtamine (J踢)
看板Love-GoPets
標題[討論] 我看粉餅是無望了XD
時間Mon Dec 18 22:17:11 2006
a) One reason NOT to announce that we were going to change the PFC payouts is
that rather than stop someone from buying PFCs, what would have happened is
that there would have been a massive gorging of food -> pink -> PFC -> more
excess gold.
b) We cannot make gold non-transferable because people would simply buy
*items* of gold value such as a RFC and use that as a currency of exchange.
c) Most games with items, make the items non-transferrable after use (like
WoW and CyWorld) this helps the operators for once the item is used no other
use can use it and thus it has to be bought fresh again. I understand this,
but we are trying to figure out how to make a profitable company without
having to do that. Imagine a Butterfly wing that just cannot be traded??? We
do that with just a few items for subs especially. I want an economy where
the users are free to pass around objects as they please. Prize Points are an
exception here for otherwise it would be soon meaningess...
d) expect to see changes soon in items requiring Pink Shells to purchase
Thank you,
-Erik
我也懶得翻了XD 求高手吧 (我只能看得懂大概XD)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.73.20.107
1F：推 sakura0829:大概說什麼 12/18 22:20
2F：推 birthstone:還好剛賣出一個池塘...金貝飽飽的(#￣▽￣#) 12/18 22:24
3F：→ birthstone:有題到WoW耶XD 12/18 22:25
4F：推 sakura0829:好閃 但沒幫我解答 12/18 22:26
5F：推 birthstone:a)他們不想改變已經決定的作法,怕我們狂吃餅 12/18 22:36
6F：推 birthstone:b)因為我們太容易賺金貝,又不可能限制金貝的流動 12/18 22:39
7F：推 gracerctsai:我也好想這樣喔 12/18 22:43
8F：推 birthstone:d)很快的我們將會在購買物品上多用些粉 12/18 22:44
9F：→ birthstone:c)太長了...不會翻orz a)b)也只說個大概而已= = 12/18 22:45
10F：推 vOvlll:c)他不想限制我們互相傳送物品 (點數商店的是例外) 12/18 22:51
11F：推 forestcatcat:他們是打算把粉貝取代金貝0.0？ 12/18 22:53
12F：推 gracerctsai:可以再問一次, 他們下一家合作的公司是哪一家呢? 12/18 23:03
13F：推 tutuwhite:破21人 但是好多人隱形阿 12/18 23:09