作者Jtamine (J踢)
看板Love-GoPets
标题[讨论] 我看粉饼是无望了XD
时间Mon Dec 18 22:17:11 2006
a) One reason NOT to announce that we were going to change the PFC payouts is
that rather than stop someone from buying PFCs, what would have happened is
that there would have been a massive gorging of food -> pink -> PFC -> more
excess gold.
b) We cannot make gold non-transferable because people would simply buy
*items* of gold value such as a RFC and use that as a currency of exchange.
c) Most games with items, make the items non-transferrable after use (like
WoW and CyWorld) this helps the operators for once the item is used no other
use can use it and thus it has to be bought fresh again. I understand this,
but we are trying to figure out how to make a profitable company without
having to do that. Imagine a Butterfly wing that just cannot be traded??? We
do that with just a few items for subs especially. I want an economy where
the users are free to pass around objects as they please. Prize Points are an
exception here for otherwise it would be soon meaningess...
d) expect to see changes soon in items requiring Pink Shells to purchase
Thank you,
-Erik
我也懒得翻了XD 求高手吧 (我只能看得懂大概XD)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.73.20.107
1F：推 sakura0829:大概说什麽 12/18 22:20
2F：推 birthstone:还好刚卖出一个池塘...金贝饱饱的(#￣▽￣#) 12/18 22:24
3F：→ birthstone:有题到WoW耶XD 12/18 22:25
4F：推 sakura0829:好闪 但没帮我解答 12/18 22:26
5F：推 birthstone:a)他们不想改变已经决定的作法,怕我们狂吃饼 12/18 22:36
6F：推 birthstone:b)因为我们太容易赚金贝,又不可能限制金贝的流动 12/18 22:39
7F：推 gracerctsai:我也好想这样喔 12/18 22:43
8F：推 birthstone:d)很快的我们将会在购买物品上多用些粉 12/18 22:44
9F：→ birthstone:c)太长了...不会翻orz a)b)也只说个大概而已= = 12/18 22:45
10F：推 vOvlll:c)他不想限制我们互相传送物品 (点数商店的是例外) 12/18 22:51
11F：推 forestcatcat:他们是打算把粉贝取代金贝0.0？ 12/18 22:53
12F：推 gracerctsai:可以再问一次, 他们下一家合作的公司是哪一家呢? 12/18 23:03
13F：推 tutuwhite:破21人 但是好多人隐形阿 12/18 23:09