會不會NBA早就要SUNS出線 只讓Clippers打到這為止 (賺些新觀眾/球迷) 所以之前Clippers快贏的時候 就必須讓一下 以免SUNS追起來太假太誇張 打到第七場 多賺些門票還有轉播費用 廣告費用 第七場就不能有任何意外變成Clippers贏 所以比數差很多 結論還是利益問題 畢竟會出大錢看SUNS比賽的人比Clippers還多 廣告費也一定比較高 這次搞完人氣提升 以後還要很久才會又來一次吧 個人猜測@@.. --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 72.25.67.55 不是質疑球員 也許是教練? 沒人知道 (他們也只是按照指示工作而已) NBA的營收是平分給每個隊伍 隊伍自己在衡量要花多少錢在薪水上面 隊伍花的錢越少(薪資) 老闆能留住(賺)的錢越多 營收大家平分的話 就會把越重要的比賽 讓給越多人氣的球隊打 在黑人區的New Orleans 就沒人會看 所以也看不到打冠軍賽 (非種族歧視) 提出來大家討論@@~ http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1694859 Revenue sharing is a financial agreement between teams, not players and owners. The purpose of revenue sharing is to even the playing field again. Money is sent from teams in big markets, who make a ton, to teams in small markets, that don't. This is supposed to keep the teams in the small markets competitive, even though they don't make the same scratch as the big guys. Say you're the Yankees. You sell out Yankee Stadium every game for an entire season. You make more money on merchandise than the US Mint. You have your own sports channel, and people pay you to watch it. Now, say you're the Detroit Tigers. You can't even spare enough cash to watch the Yankees' channel. You're playing in Detroit, for chrissakes. How can you even attempt to play at the level of the Yankees? Simple. The Yankees give you money so you can stay afloat (and they have somebody to beat). That's revenue sharing. 簡單來說 賺的多的球隊要把錢分給賺的少的 讓賺的少的能有多點錢花在球員身上(或者老闆帳戶= =) 美國國稅局http://0rz.net/db1nV 裡面也有提到 從全國電視轉播 週邊商品都是平分 - 所以讓球賽辦在賺很多的地方 大家都有好處 畢竟這還是個商業組織 大家都想賺錢 ※ 編輯: supa 來自: 72.25.67.55 (05/23 14:30)