会不会NBA早就要SUNS出线 只让Clippers打到这为止 (赚些新观众/球迷) 所以之前Clippers快赢的时候 就必须让一下 以免SUNS追起来太假太夸张 打到第七场 多赚些门票还有转播费用 广告费用 第七场就不能有任何意外变成Clippers赢 所以比数差很多 结论还是利益问题 毕竟会出大钱看SUNS比赛的人比Clippers还多 广告费也一定比较高 这次搞完人气提升 以後还要很久才会又来一次吧 个人猜测@@.. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 72.25.67.55 不是质疑球员 也许是教练? 没人知道 (他们也只是按照指示工作而已) NBA的营收是平分给每个队伍 队伍自己在衡量要花多少钱在薪水上面 队伍花的钱越少(薪资) 老板能留住(赚)的钱越多 营收大家平分的话 就会把越重要的比赛 让给越多人气的球队打 在黑人区的New Orleans 就没人会看 所以也看不到打冠军赛 (非种族歧视) 提出来大家讨论@@~ http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1694859 Revenue sharing is a financial agreement between teams, not players and owners. The purpose of revenue sharing is to even the playing field again. Money is sent from teams in big markets, who make a ton, to teams in small markets, that don't. This is supposed to keep the teams in the small markets competitive, even though they don't make the same scratch as the big guys. Say you're the Yankees. You sell out Yankee Stadium every game for an entire season. You make more money on merchandise than the US Mint. You have your own sports channel, and people pay you to watch it. Now, say you're the Detroit Tigers. You can't even spare enough cash to watch the Yankees' channel. You're playing in Detroit, for chrissakes. How can you even attempt to play at the level of the Yankees? Simple. The Yankees give you money so you can stay afloat (and they have somebody to beat). That's revenue sharing. 简单来说 赚的多的球队要把钱分给赚的少的 让赚的少的能有多点钱花在球员身上(或者老板帐户= =) 美国国税局http://0rz.net/db1nV 里面也有提到 从全国电视转播 周边商品都是平分 - 所以让球赛办在赚很多的地方 大家都有好处 毕竟这还是个商业组织 大家都想赚钱 ※ 编辑: supa 来自: 72.25.67.55 (05/23 14:30)